PEAT-SAND SUBSTRATES FOR PLANTS GROWN IN CONTAINERS .I. EFFECT OF BASE FERTILIZERS

被引:5
作者
BUNT, AC
机构
[1] Glasshouse Crops Research Institute, Littlehampton, Sussex
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01373029
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The N, P, K, and Ca fertilizer requirements of a 75% sphagnum peat 25% sand mixture were studied using 34 quasi-latin square designs with tomato and antirrhinum as test plants. A large interaction with season in the response to N, P, and Ca was obtained. In winter, when plant growth rates were low, high rates of N and Ca with low rates of P gave a significant reduction in growth, delay in development and boron deficiency. The effects have been attributed to the high levels of NH4-N and the accompanying high pH values following mineralisation of the organic nitrogen in the base fertilizer. Under these conditions the beneficial effect of superphosphate is considered to be primarily due to a reduction in the pH and in the rate of nitrogen mineralisation. In summer, when the growth of tomatoes in a 30-day period was found to be of the order of twenty times greater than in winter, the N × P × Ca interaction was not significant and no boron deficiency was observed. Comparison was also made between the nitrogen requirements of peat-sand and loam composts. The standard peat-sand mixture was found to be deficient in available nitrogen by comparison with loam compost. Plants in the peat-sand showed a greater interaction of N levels with season than did plants in loam compost. In winter the highest rate of nitrogen gave a reduction in the growth of tomatoes in peat-sand but not in loam, whereas in summer there was a positive response to each increment of nitrogen in the peat-sand and growth was significantly better than in loam compost. © 1969 Martinus Nijhoff.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / &
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
BAKER KT, 1957, 23 CAL U AGR EXP STA
[2]   SOME CRITICAL COMPARISONS OF PEAT-SAND AND LOAM-BASED COMPOSTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO INTERPRETATION OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL ANALYSES [J].
BUNT, AC ;
ADAMS, P .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1966, 24 (02) :213-&
[3]  
BUNT AC, 1965, REP GLASSHOUSE CROPS, P119
[4]  
COCHRAN WG, 1953, EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS, P241
[5]   TOXIC EFFECT OF UREA ON PLANTS [J].
COOKE, IJ ;
COURT, MN ;
WAID, JS ;
STEPHEN, RC .
NATURE, 1962, 194 (4835) :1262-&
[6]   TOXICITY AS CAUSE OF INEFFICIENCY OF UREA AS FERTILIZER .2. EXPERIMENTAL [J].
COURT, MN ;
WAID, JS ;
STEPHEN, RC .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1964, 15 (01) :49-&
[7]  
LUCAS R. E., 1961, SOIL SCI, V92, P177, DOI 10.1097/00010694-196109000-00005
[8]  
MAYNARD DN, 1966, P AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V88, P516
[9]  
MCKEE HS, 1962, NITROGEN METABOLISM
[10]   Physiological role of asparagine and related substances in nitrogen metabolism of plants [J].
Murneek, AE .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1935, 10 (03) :447-464