BELIEFS AND VALUES IN THE NUCLEAR DEBATE

被引:53
作者
EISER, JR [1 ]
VANDERPLIGT, J [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LONDON,INST PSYCHIAT,LONDON,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb00813.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A questionnaire was administered to 47 participants attending a workshop on nuclear energy shortly after publication of a report on a proposed nuclear fuel reprocessing plant. Supporters and opponents of the proposed development differed markedly in their estimates of its possible consequences, and of the relative importance of these consequences. They also differed in their endorsement of pro‐ and anti‐nuclear lobbies, and the factors which they felt contributed most to the “quality of life”. Overall, pro‐nuclear subjects appear to place emphasis on the economic benefits of nuclear energy, while anti‐nuclear subjects appearad more concerned with social and political risks, and regraded alternative energy sources as more viable. It is concluded that an analysis of such attitudinal differences requires a consideration not only of differences in beliefs, but also of differences in belief salience. Copyright © 1979, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 536
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ANDERSON NH, 1974, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, V7
[2]  
Beckmann Petr, 1976, HLTH HAZARDS NOT GOI
[3]   The prediction of social events [J].
Cantril, H .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1938, 33 :364-389
[4]   CATEGORIZATION, COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY AND CONCEPT OF DIMENSIONAL SALIENCE [J].
EISER, JR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 1 (04) :435-453
[5]   PREDICTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE - WISH-FULFILLMENT REVISITED [J].
EISER, JR ;
EISER, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 5 (03) :315-322
[6]  
EISER JR, 1975, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V31, P769
[7]   EVALUATIVE CONSISTENCY AND SOCIAL JUDGMENT [J].
EISER, JR ;
WHITE, CJM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 30 (03) :349-359
[9]  
Fishbein M, 1975, BELIEF ATTITUDE INTE
[10]  
FULLER JG, 1975, WE ALMOST LOST DETRO