VOIDED URINE FLOW-CYTOMETRY IN SCREENING HIGH-RISK PATIENTS FOR THE PRESENCE OF BLADDER-CANCER

被引:15
作者
HERMANSEN, DK
BADALAMENT, RA
BRETTON, PR
KIMMEL, M
ASWAD, CM
WHITMORE, WF
MELAMED, MR
机构
[1] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR,UROL SERV,NEW YORK,NY 10021
[2] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR,DEPT PATHOL,NEW YORK,NY 10021
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00043764-199009000-00028
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Fifty-nine patients with a history of bladder cancer were evaluated with three serially voided urines for flow oytometry and cytology within the 24 hours preceding cystoscopy, bladder wash, and biopsy. Evaluation of the 32 patients with biopsy proven cancer revealed that for one, two, and three voided urine specimens, the sensitivity of flow oytometry in detecting bladder cancer was 29%, 35%, and 41%, respectively, whereas the sensitivity of voided urine cytology was 44%, 63%, and 67%, respectively. Bladder wash flow oytometry had a sensitivity of 76%. Interpretation of the voided urine flow oytometry was based on a control group of 80 volunteers with negative voided urine cytology. The control group demonstrated that a minimum of 1500 analyzable cells was necessary for a reliable histogram. Considering all 59 patients, voided urine flow oytometry, bladder wash flow cytometry, and voided urine cytology were acceptable for analysis in 53%, 93%, and 100% of the specimens, respectively. Voided urine specimens appear less suitable than bladder irrigation specimens for evaluation by flow cytometry. Voided urine flow cytometry is less sensitive in detecting bladder cancer than voided urinary cytology or bladder wash flow cytometry and is not effective for use as a bladder cancer screening test. © by American College of Occupational Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 897
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BADALAMENT RA, 1987, CANCER, V60, P1423, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19871001)60:7<1423::AID-CNCR2820600702>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-6
[3]   FLOW-CYTOMETRY IN BLADDER-CANCER DETECTION AND EVALUATION USING ACRIDINE-ORANGE METACHROMATIC NUCLEIC-ACID STAINING OF IRRIGATION CYTOLOGY SPECIMENS [J].
COLLSTE, LG ;
DARZYNKIEWICZ, Z ;
TRAGANOS, F ;
SHARPLESS, TK ;
SOGANI, P ;
GRABSTALD, H ;
WHITMORE, WF ;
MELAMED, MR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 123 (04) :478-485
[4]  
COLLSTE LG, 1980, CANCER, V45, P2389, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19800501)45:9<2389::AID-CNCR2820450925>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-Y
[6]  
DARZYNKIEWICZ Z, 1975, EXP CELL RES, V95, P143
[7]  
HERMANSEN DK, 1989, CANCER, V63, P1780
[8]   FLOW CYTOMETRIC STUDY COMPARING PAIRED BLADDER WASHING AND VOIDED URINE FOR BLADDER-CANCER DETECTION [J].
KONCHUBA, AM ;
SCHELLHAMMER, PF ;
ALEXANDER, JP ;
WRIGHT, GL .
UROLOGY, 1989, 33 (02) :89-96
[9]  
KOSS LG, 1979, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOLOGY, V2, P761
[10]   FLOW-CYTOMETRY VERSUS URINARY CYTOLOGY IN THE EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH BLADDER-CANCER [J].
MURPHY, WM ;
EMERSON, LD ;
CHANDLER, RW ;
MOINUDDIN, SM ;
SOLOWAY, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 136 (04) :815-819