CURRENT ETIOLOGY AND COMPARISON OF PENICILLIN, ERYTHROMYCIN, AND CEPHALEXIN THERAPIES

被引:42
作者
DEMIDOVICH, CW
WITTLER, RR
RUFF, ME
BASS, JW
BROWNING, WC
机构
[1] TRIPLER ARMY MED CTR,DEPT PEDIAT,POB 330,HONOLULU,HI 96859
[2] TRIPLER ARMY MED CTR,DEPT PHARM,HONOLULU,HI 96859
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN | 1990年 / 144卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150360037015
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
We attempted to determine the causative bacterial pathogens of impetigo in children in our area, to compare the effectiveness of three frequently used oral antimicrobial treatment regimens, and to correlate the antimicrobial sensitivity of the bacterial isolates with clinical responses to treatment. Seventy-three children with impetigo were randomly assigned to receive penicillin V potassium or cephalexin monohydrate, both administered in dosages of 40 to 50 mg/kg per day, or erythromycin estolate administered in a dosage of 30 to 40 mg/kg per day. All drugs were given in three divided doses for 10 days. Treatment failure was defined as persistence of lesions 8 to 10 days after initiation of drug therapy as determined by examiners blinded to the treatment therapies. Forty-five (62%) cultures showed Staphylococcus aureus only, 14 (19%) showed S aureus and group A β-hemolytic streptococci, six (8%) showed group A β-hemolytic streptococci only, and eight (11%) showed no growth or other organisms. Treatment failure occurred in six (24%) of 25 patients treated with penicillin V, one (4%) of 25 patients treated with erythromycin estolate, and no patients treated with cephalexin. We conclude that S aureus is the most common cause of impetigo in children in our study population, that cephalexin is the most effective treatment, that erythromycin estolate is nearly equally effective and may be preferred on a cost-effectiveness basis, and that penicillin V is inadequate for treatment of this infection. © 1990, American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1313 / 1315
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Barton L L, 1988, Pediatr Dermatol, V5, P88, DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1988.tb01144.x
[2]  
Barton L L, 1987, Pediatr Dermatol, V4, P185, DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1987.tb00776.x
[3]  
CHARNEY E, 1967, PEDIATRICS, V40, P188
[4]   NATURAL-HISTORY OF IMPETIGO .2. ETIOLOGIC AGENTS AND BACTERIAL INTERACTIONS [J].
DAJANI, AS ;
WANNAMAKER, LW ;
FERRIERI, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1972, 51 (11) :2863-+
[5]   TREATMENT OF STREPTOCOCCAL SKIN INFECTIONS [J].
DILLON, HC .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1970, 76 (05) :676-&
[6]   IMPETIGO CONTAGIOSA - SUPPURATIVE AND NON-SUPPURATIVE COMPLICATIONS .I. CLINICAL BACTERIOLOGIC AND EPIDEMIOLOGIC HARACTERISTICS OF IMPETIGO [J].
DILLON, HC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1968, 115 (05) :530-&
[7]  
DUX PH, 1986, CURR THER RES CLIN E, V40, P933
[8]   TREATMENT OF PYODERMA IN CHILDREN [J].
ESTERLY, NB ;
MARKOWITZ, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1970, 212 (10) :1667-+
[9]  
RUBY RJ, 1973, PEDIATRICS, V52, P854
[10]  
SCHACHNER L, 1983, PEDIATR CLIN N AM, V30, P397