VALIDATION OF AN INDIRECT CALORIMETER TO MEASURE OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS

被引:47
作者
RONCO, JJ [1 ]
PHANG, PT [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,ST PAULS HOSP,PROGRAM CRIT CARE,1081 BURRARD ST,VANCOUVER V6T 1Y6,BC,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0883-9441(91)90031-N
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
We tested a system of indirect calorimetry (Deltatrac Metabolic Monitor) for accuracy to measure oxygen consumption and sensitivity to detect small changes in oxygen consumption, in vitro, using a lung model simulation of ventilating patients who have stiff lungs. In vivo, we assessed reproducibility of the system to measure oxygen consumption in patients who had adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or sepsis. In vitro, oxygen consumptions of 100, 200, 300, and 500 mL/min were simulated by injecting N2 into the lung model at 3-minute ventilations (10, 15, and 20 L/min) and at four levels of FIO2 (0.40, 0.60, 0.70, and 0.80). After each baseline measurement, N2 flow was increased to simulate an increase in VO2 of 10% to 15%. At FIO2 of 0.6 and 0.8, 15 cm H2O of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was applied to the lung model and measurements repeated. The Deltatrac had an average error of -2.1% (range, -7% to 3%). After simulated increases in oxygen consumption, the Deltatrac detected the change with an error less than 1% in all combinations tested. Although adding PEEP to the lung model altered accuracy of measurement, error was always less than 5%. We measured oxygen consumption in 27 ventilated and sedated patients who had severe ARDS or sepsis (FIO2, 0.60 ± 0.1; PEEP, 9 ± 3 cm H2O; static compliance, 27 ± 12 mL/cm H2O [mean ± SD]). Coefficient of variation for oxygen consumption was 4.6% ± 1.6%. Even at FIO2, 0.80 coefficient of variation was less than 6%. We conclude that this system of indirect calorimetry is accurate, sensitive, and reproducible to measure VO2 in critically ill patients. © 1991.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 41
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Schumacker, Cain, The concept of a critical oxygen delivery, Intensive Care Med, 13, pp. 223-229, (1987)
[2]  
Archie, Mathematic coupling of data. A common source of error, Ann Surg, 193, pp. 296-303, (1981)
[3]  
Stratton, Feustel, Newell, Regression of calculated variables in the presence of shared measurement error, J Appl Physiol, 62, pp. 2083-2093, (1987)
[4]  
Ultman, Bursztein, Analysis of error in the determination of respiratory gas exchange at varying FiO<sub>2</sub>, J Appl Physiol, 50, pp. 210-216, (1981)
[5]  
Westenkow, Cutler, Wallace, Instrumentation for monitoring gas exchange and metabolic rate in critically ill patients, Critical Care Medicine, 12, pp. 183-187, (1984)
[6]  
Feenstra, Holland, van Lanschot, Et al., Design and validation of an automatic metabolic monitor, Intensive Care Med, 11, pp. 95-99, (1985)
[7]  
Eccles, Swinamer, Jones, Et al., Validation of a compact system for measuring gas exchange, Crit Care Med, 14, pp. 807-811, (1986)
[8]  
Nelson, Anderson, Garcia, Clinical validation of a new metabolic monitor suitable for use in critically ill patients, Crit Care Med, 15, pp. 951-957, (1987)
[9]  
Braun, Zundel, Freiboth, Et al., Evaluation of methods for indirect calorimetry with a ventilated lung model, Intensive Care Med, 15, pp. 196-202, (1989)
[10]  
Browning, Linberg, Turney, Et al., The effects of fluctuating FiO<sub>2</sub> on metabolic measurements in mechanically ventilated patients, Crit Care Med, 10, pp. 82-85, (1982)