PILOT-STUDY ANALYSIS OF THE HISTOLOGIC AND BACTERIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS IN CHEMOSURGICAL PEEL USING A MINIPIG MODEL

被引:14
作者
ZUKOWSKI, ML
MOSSIE, RD
ROTH, SI
GIESE, S
MCKINNEY, P
机构
关键词
CHEMOSURGICAL PEEL; MINIPIG MODEL; OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS;
D O I
10.1007/BF00455050
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The histologic changes associated with chemosurgery are well documented, but the data concerning the effects of occlusive dressings (adhesive tape, gauze, or ointments) is largely anecdotal. Wide differences of opinion exist as to the best method of phenol application and postpeel wound care regimen. Using a Yucatan minipig as our animal model, we studied the histologic and bacteriologic differences that various commonly used occlusive dressings have upon the initial burn depth and the subsequent healing of peeled skin. We also compared chemical peel with dermabrasion and chemabrasion. Our results showed to statistical difference in peel depth between ''wet'' versus ''moist'' phenol application or between occluded versus nonoccluded dressings. Based upon this animal model, we recommend that phenol solutions be applied moist rather than wet and that an occlusive dressing other than adhesive tape be used and maintained for a minimum of four days.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 59
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Alt T., Occluded Baker-Gordon chemical peel: review and update, J Dermatol Surg Oncol, 15, 9, (1989)
[2]  
Ayres S., Superficial chemosurgery, Arch Dermatol, 89, (1964)
[3]  
Bergstrom T., Woodworth M., Feisullin S., Beall P., Characterization of the Yucatan miniature pig skin and small intestine for pharmaceutical applications, Lab Animal Sci, 36, 4, (1986)
[4]  
Bhangoo K.S., Histologic changes following chemical face peeling, Plast Reconstr Surg, 54, (1974)
[5]  
Brodland D., Cullimore K., Roenigk R., Gibson L., Depths of chemexfoliation induced by various concentrations and application techniques of trichloroacetic acid in a porcine model, J Dermatol Surg Oncol, 15, 9, (1989)
[6]  
Brody H., Complications of chemical peeling, J Dermatol Surg Oncol, 15, 9, (1989)
[7]  
Horton C., Sadove R., Refinements in combined chemical peel and simultaneous abrasion of the face, Ann Plast Surg, 19, 6, (1987)
[8]  
Kligman A., Baker T., Gordon H., Long-term histologic follow-up of phenol face peels, Plast Reconstr Surg, 75, 5, (1985)
[9]  
Litton C., Szachowicz E., Trinidad G., Present day status of the chemical face peel, Aesth Plast Surg, 10, (1986)
[10]  
Lober C., Chemexfoliation-indication and cautions, J Am Acad Dermatol, 17, (1987)