MULTIATTRIBUTE HEALTH-STATUS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS - HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX

被引:636
作者
FEENY, D
FURLONG, W
BOYLE, M
TORRANCE, GW
机构
[1] Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Mcmaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, HSC 3H3
[2] Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Mcmaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
[3] Department of Economics, Mcmaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
[4] Department of Psychiatry, Mcmaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
[5] Department of Management Science, Mcmaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-199507060-00004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, multi-attribute approaches to the assessment of health status are reviewed with a special focus on 2 recently developed systems, the Health Utilities Index (HUI) Mark II and Mark III systems. The Mark LI system consists of 7 attributes: sensation, mobility, emotion, cognition, self-care, pain and fertility. The Mark III system contains 8 attributes: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition and pain. Each attribute consists of multiple levels of functioning. A combination of levels across the attributes constitutes a health state. The HUI systems are deliberately focused on the fundamental core attributes of health status, and on the capacity of individuals to function with respect to these attributes. Thus, the measure obtained constitutes a pure description of health status, uncontaminated by differential opportunity or preference. Multi-attribute systems provide a compact but comprehensive framework for describing health status for use in population health and programme evaluation studies. An important advantage of such systems is their ability to simultaneously provide detail on an attribute-by-attribute basis and to capture combinations of deficits among attributes, An additional advantage is their compatibility with multi-attribute preference functions, which provide a method for computing a summary health-related quality-of-life score for each health state.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 502
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Cadman D., Goldsmith C., Torrance G.W., Et al., Development of a health status index for Ontario children, Final report to the Ontario Ministry of Health on reseach grant DM648(00633), (1986)
[2]  
Cadman D., Goldsmith C., Bashim P., Values, preferences, and decisions in the care of children with developmental disabilities, Dev Behav Pediatr, 5, (1984)
[3]  
Cadman D., Goldsmith C., Construction of social value or utility–based health indices: the usefulness of factorial experimental design plans, J Chronic Dis, 39, (1986)
[4]  
Rosenbaum P., Cadman D., Kirpalani H., Pediatrics: assessing quality of life, Quality of life assessmentin Clinical trials, (1990)
[5]  
Feeny D.H., Furlong W., Barr R.D., Et al., A comprehensive multi–attribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer, J Clin Oncol, 10, (1992)
[6]  
Torrance G.W., Boyle M.H., Horwood S.P., Application of multiattribute utility theory to measure social preferences forhealth states, Operations Res, 30, (1982)
[7]  
Guyatt G.H., Feeny D.H., Patrick D.L., Measuring health–related quality of life, Ann intern Med, 118, (1993)
[8]  
Torrance G., Furlong W., Feeny D., Et al., Multi–attribute preference functions: health utilities index, Pharmacoeconomics, 7, 6, (1995)
[9]  
Kirshner B., Guyatt G., A methodological framework for assessing health indices, J Chronic Dis, 38, pp. 27-36, (1985)
[10]  
Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D., The MOS 36–item short from health survey (SF–36), Med Care, 30, (1992)