REINFORCEMENT VALUE AS RELATED TO DECISION TIME

[1] BARKER RG, 1942, STUDIES PERSONALITY, P13

[2] The generalization of approach responses as a function of stimulus intensity and strength of motivation [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1942, 33 (02) : 209 - 226

[3] A quantitative theory of decision [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1943, 50 : 595 - 621

[4] Studies in decision II An empirical test of a quantitative theory of decision [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1943, 32 (05): : 411 - 423

[5] LEWIN K, 1938, CONTRIB PSYCHOL THE, V1

[6] LEWIN K, 1935, DYNAMIC THEORIES PER

[7] LOTSOF EJ, 1951, THESIS OHIO STATE U

[8] MCNEMAR Q, 1949, PSYCHOL STATISTICS

[9] Miller N., 1944, PERSONALITY BEHAV DI, P431

[10] Rotter J., 1954, SOCIAL LEARNING CLIN, DOI DOI 10.1037/10788-000

[1] BARKER RG, 1942, STUDIES PERSONALITY, P13

[2] The generalization of approach responses as a function of stimulus intensity and strength of motivation [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1942, 33 (02) : 209 - 226

[3] A quantitative theory of decision [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1943, 50 : 595 - 621

[4] Studies in decision II An empirical test of a quantitative theory of decision [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1943, 32 (05): : 411 - 423

[5] LEWIN K, 1938, CONTRIB PSYCHOL THE, V1

[6] LEWIN K, 1935, DYNAMIC THEORIES PER

[7] LOTSOF EJ, 1951, THESIS OHIO STATE U

[8] MCNEMAR Q, 1949, PSYCHOL STATISTICS

[9] Miller N., 1944, PERSONALITY BEHAV DI, P431

[10] Rotter J., 1954, SOCIAL LEARNING CLIN, DOI DOI 10.1037/10788-000