MODEL FOR USING FINAL EXAMINATION AS A MEASURE OF AMOUNT LEARNED IN CLASSROOM LEARNING

被引:2
作者
CARVER, RP [1 ]
机构
[1] AMER INST RES,8555 16TH ST,SILVER SPRINGS,MD 20910
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-3984.1969.tb00660.x
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
A student's score on the final examination in a classroom learning situation does not necessarily represent the amount learned during the course. Various measures of gain have been advanced to measure the amount learned, but all have subsequently been found inadequate. It is hypothesized that the relationship between test scores and knowledge is curvilinear. A rationale is presented for the curvilinear nature of the posited relationship and for the fit of the model to classroom learning. From hypothetical data conforming to the model expressed in a mathematical formula, it was shown that it is possible for the final examination to be the best indicant of amount learned, even though individuals are not equal in proficiency at the beginning of the learning task. Based upon several considerations it was concluded that, at present, the best indicant of amount learned in many classroom situations is the final examination. Copyright © 1969, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 68
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
BECHTOLD H P, 1963, Percept Mot Skills, V16, P831
[2]   BRIEF REPORT - DANGER INVOLVED IN THE USE OF TESTS WHICH MEASURE FACTORS [J].
CARVER, RP .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1968, 3 (04) :509-512
[3]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING AND INTELLIGENCE [J].
CARVER, RP ;
DUBOIS, PH .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1967, 4 (03) :133-136
[4]  
CARVER RP, 1968, COLLEGE BOARD REV, V70, P10
[5]  
CARVER RP, 1965, THESIS WASHINGTON U
[6]   PITFALLS IN THE MEASUREMENT OF GAINS IN ACHIEVEMENT [J].
DIEDERICH, PB .
SCHOOL REVIEW, 1956, 64 (02) :59-63
[7]  
DUBOIS PH, 1962, TRAINING RESEARCH ED, P63
[8]  
JOHNSON PO, 1953, INTRO STATISTICAL ME
[9]  
Lord F. M., 1968, STAT THEORY MENTAL T
[10]   THE MEASUREMENT OF GROWTH [J].
LORD, FM .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1956, 16 (04) :421-437