A BIOECONOMIC SIMULATION-MODEL FOR A HIERARCHICAL SWINE BREEDING STRUCTURE

被引:7
作者
FAUST, MA
TESS, MW
ROBISON, OW
机构
[1] N CAROLINA STATE UNIV,DEPT ANIM SCI,RALEIGH,NC 27695
[2] MONTANA STATE UNIV,DEPT ANIM & RANGE SCI,BOZEMAN,MT 59717
关键词
PIGS; HIERARCHICAL BREEDING PROGRAMS; GENETIC CHANGE; ECONOMICS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.2527/1992.7061760x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
A stochastic computer model was developed to simulate individual pigs in a hierarchical breeding system. The bioeconomic model was designed as a tool to facilitate the evaluation of selection, culling, and management strategies for a three-tiered breeding structure. Events such as mating, farrowing, and selection occurred weekly. Variables included number of pigs born alive, survival rate from birth to weaning, average daily gain and backfat at 110 kg, number of pigs weaned, feed per gain, days from weaning to 110 kg, age at puberty, and growth rate and weight of sows and service boars. Also included were probabilities of conception, return to estrus by week, survival, involuntary culling, male infertility, and unacceptable conformation. Variables important for selection were determined by breeding value, individual and maternal heterosis, parity, size of birth litter, sex, age of dam, genetic and environmental relationships between variables, and common litter, permanent, and random environmental effects. Variables derived from selection variables were computed by regression using phenotypic relationships between all variables. Also, a random environmental effect was added to predicted performance. Means and variances of variables differed between genetic lines. Production costs included feed, non-feed operating, fixed, and replacement stock costs. Income included market animals, culls, and replacements sold to lower tiers. Effects of changes in backfat on market value and sow maintenance feed costs were not modeled. An example is given to illustrate model output.
引用
收藏
页码:1760 / 1774
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
AUMAITRE A, 1976, Livestock Production Science, V3, P75, DOI 10.1016/0301-6226(76)90009-9
[2]  
BELONSKY GM, 1988, J ANIM SCI, V66, P1124
[3]   SIMULATION OF BREED AND CROSSBREEDING EFFECTS ON COSTS OF PORK PRODUCTION [J].
BENNETT, GL ;
TESS, WM ;
DICKERSON, GE ;
JOHNSON, RK .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1983, 56 (04) :801-813
[4]   GENETIC-IMPLICATIONS OF A SIMULATION-MODEL OF LITTER SIZE IN SWINE BASED ON OVULATION RATE, POTENTIAL EMBRYONIC VIABILITY AND UTERINE CAPACITY .1. GENETIC THEORY [J].
BENNETT, GL ;
LEYMASTER, KA .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1990, 68 (04) :969-979
[5]  
BENNETT GL, 1989, J ANIM SCI, V67, P1230
[6]   SIMULATION OF HETEROSIS EFFECTS ON COSTS OF PORK PRODUCTION [J].
BENNETT, GL ;
TESS, MW ;
DICKERSON, GE ;
JOHNSON, RK .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1983, 56 (04) :792-800
[7]   A GENETIC-ANALYSIS OF SOW PRODUCTIVITY TRAITS [J].
BERESKIN, B .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1984, 59 (05) :1149-1163
[8]  
BERESKIN B, 1973, J ANIM SCI, V36, P821
[9]   ECONOMIC-EFFICIENCY OF PIG BREEDING SCHEMES - BREEDING COMPANY VIEW [J].
BICHARD, M .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1977, 4 (03) :245-254
[10]   DISSEMINATION OF GENETIC IMPROVEMENT THROUGH A LIVESTOCK INDUSTRY [J].
BICHARD, M .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1971, 13 (AUG) :401-&