SOCIOCULTURAL INEQUITIES IN ACCESS TO PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS - THE ROLE OF INSURANCE-COVERAGE AND REGULATORY POLICIES

被引:24
作者
MOATTI, JP
LEGALES, C
JULIAN, C
DURBEC, JP
MATTEI, JF
AYME, S
机构
[1] HOP ENFANTS LA TIMONE,CTR GENET MED,INSERM,U242,CHROMOSOMAL PHISIOPATHOL RES UNIT,F-13385 MARSEILLE 5,FRANCE
[2] INSERM,U240,RISK ASSESSMENT & EVALUAT PREVENT RES UNIT,F-92263 FONTENAY ROSES,FRANCE
[3] INSERM,U31,BIOSTAT RES UNIT,F-13009 MARSEILLE,FRANCE
关键词
Amniocentesis; Inequities in access; Insurance coverage; Risk perception;
D O I
10.1002/pd.1970100507
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The article presents the results of a 4‐month‐period survey by questionnaire among all women attending the Marseille Centre for Prenatal Diagnosis for amniocentesis. Socio‐cultural status of women getting access to amniocentesis is significantly higher than in the general population of pregnant women in the same geographic area of south‐eastern France. Sociocultural status is also higher among women who have to cover costs of procedure to get access to amniocentesis than among those who benefit from it free‐of‐charge according to French Social Security regulations. In contrast, risk perception and attitudes toward termination of pregnancy are similar in these two groups. A total of 24·4 per cent of respondents declared that they got access to amniocentesis ‘on their own initiative’, the remaining 75·6 per cent declaring that they ‘were following medical advice’. Multidimensional analysis shows that the women who do not benefit from free‐of‐charge amniocentesis, and who have a high level of education and no antecedents of fetal and perinatal deaths, are more likely to perceive themselves as ‘self‐referring’. The study indicates that institutional coverage may be effective in reducing socio‐cultural inequities in access to prenatal diagnosis. But such a policy may conflict with the respect of women' s individual autonomy in the amniocentesis decision. Copyright © 1990 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 325
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
ADLER B, 1982, PEDIATRICS, V69, P94
[2]  
ARROW KJ, 1963, AM ECON REV, V53, P941
[3]   THE INFLUENCE OF OBSTETRICIANS ON THE UTILIZATION OF AMNIOCENTESIS [J].
BERNHARDT, BA ;
BANNERMAN, RM .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1982, 2 (02) :115-121
[4]  
DAVIES BL, 1982, NURS RES, V31, P56
[5]  
GARDENT H, 1984, REV EPIDEM SANTE PUB, V31, P88
[6]  
JULIAN C, 1988, PRENAT DIAGN, V9, P77
[7]   PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS FOR THE DETECTION OF DOWN SYNDROME - WHY ARE SO FEW ELIGIBLE WOMEN TESTED [J].
LIPPMANHAND, A ;
PIPER, M .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1981, 1 (04) :249-257
[8]   ACCEPTANCE OF AMNIOCENTESIS BY LOW-INCOME PATIENTS IN AN URBAN HOSPITAL [J].
MARION, JP ;
KASSAM, G ;
FERNHOFF, PM ;
BRANTLEY, KE ;
CARROLL, L ;
ZACHARIAS, J ;
KLEIN, L ;
PRIEST, JH ;
ELSAS, LJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 138 (01) :11-15
[9]  
METHENY WP, 1988, SOC BIOL, V35, P51
[10]  
SEALS BF, 1985, SOC BIOL, V32, P13