共 19 条
[1]
[2]
A better alternative to the h index[J] Lutz Bornmann Journal of Informetrics 2013,
[3]
The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits[J] Lutz Bornmann;Loet Leydesdorff;Rüdiger Mutz Journal of Informetrics 2013,
[4]
The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011[J] Lutz Bornmann Journal of Informetrics 2011,
[5]
Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches[J] Lutz Bornmann;Loet Leydesdorff Journal of Informetrics 2011,
[6]
Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers[J] Loet Leydesdorff Scientometrics 2012,
[7]
Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations[J] Ludo Waltman;Nees Jan van Eck;Thed N. van Leeuwen;Martijn S. Visser;Anthony F.J. van Raan Journal of Informetrics 2010,
[8]
Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization[J] Lutz Bornmann Journal of Informetrics 2010,
[9]
Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper[J] Lutz Bornmann Journal of Informetrics 2010,
[10]
Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance[J] Tobias Opthof;Loet Leydesdorff Journal of Informetrics 2010,