轴向载荷对双节段颈椎人工椎间盘置换邻下位关节突关节压力的影响

被引:4
作者
陈雷 [1 ]
李宜照 [1 ]
赵秀文 [2 ]
李康华 [3 ]
机构
[1] 日照市人民医院骨科
[2] 日照市卫生学校
[3] 中南大学湘雅医院骨科
关键词
颈椎; 双节段; 人工椎间盘; 生物力学; 关节突关节;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R687.3 [骨骼手术];
学科分类号
100220 [骨科学];
摘要
背景:国内外尚未见双节段Bryan颈人工椎间盘置换后邻近节段关节突关节内压力的测量研究。目的:观察轴向载荷对双节段颈椎人工椎间盘置换和前路椎间融合内固定对邻下位节段关节突关节内压力的影响,以期为双节段人工颈椎间盘置换的临床应用提供生物力学依据。设计、时间及地点:体外对比观察,生物力学测定实验,于2006-01/02在中南大学材料科学与工程学院国家重点实验室完成。材料:取新鲜人体尸体颈椎标本11具,节段包括C3T1,剔除肌肉组织保留椎间盘、韧带和关节囊结构的完整。方法:取11具新鲜完整的成人下颈段标本,分别制成C4~5,C5~6椎间盘完整、椎间盘置换、椎间融合3个模型组,在标本上施加轴向分级载荷,将微型阻电式压力传感器置入C5~6,C6~7关节突关节内。主要观察指标:测量各组于25,50,75,100,125和150N载荷下C5~6,C6~7关节突关节内的压力。结果:在轴向加载下,下位节段关节突关节内的压力随着施加载荷的增大而增大。C4~5,C5~6双节段人工椎间盘置换组与椎间盘完整组相比,下位置换节段和邻近下位节段关节突关节内的压力变化相近,差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。C4~5,C5~6椎间融合组与人工椎间盘置换组、椎间盘完整组相比邻近下位节段关节突关节内的压力显著增高(P<0.05)。结论:颈椎双节段人工椎间盘置换后置换下位节段和邻近下位节段关节突关节内压力与完整标本相近,提示颈椎双节段人工椎间盘置换能够重建颈椎生物力学性能。颈椎双节段椎间盘摘除融合内固定后邻近下位关节突关节压力增加,可能是多节段颈椎融合后邻近节段发生退行性变或退行性变加速的原因之一。
引用
收藏
页码:10218 / 10222
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study [J].
Cheng, Lei ;
Nie, Lin ;
Zhang, Li ;
Hou, Yong .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (05) :1347-1351
[2]
Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases [J].
Kim, Seok Woo ;
Limson, Marc Anthony ;
Kim, Soo-Bum ;
Arbatin, Jose Joefrey F. ;
Chang, Kee-Young ;
Park, Moon-Soo ;
Shin, Jae-hyuk ;
Ju, Yeong-Su .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (02) :218-231
[3]
Adjacent Segment Disc Pressures Following Two-Level Cervical Disc Replacement Versus Simulated Anterior Cervical Fusion.[J].Dirk Uyttendaele;Peter H. Dangerfield;Eric B. Laxer;Bruce V. Darden;Daniel B. Murrey;R. Alden Milam;Alfred L. Rhyne;Brian Claytor;Donna S. Nussman;Timothy W. Powers;Matthew A. Davies;S. Chad Bryant;Scott P. Larsen;Meghal Bhatt;John Brodziak;Jelena Polic.Studies in Health Technology and Informatics.2006,
[4]
Multilevel cervical fusion and its effect on disc degeneration and osteophyte formation [J].
Lopez-Espina, CG ;
Amirouche, F ;
Havalad, V .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (09) :972-978
[5]
Biomechanics of the C5-C6 spinal unit before and after placement of a disc prosthesis [J].
Galbusera, F. ;
Fantigrossi, A. ;
Raimondi, M. T. ;
Sassi, M. ;
Fornari, M. ;
Assietti, R. .
BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2006, 5 (04) :253-261
[6]
Cervical Disc Replacement.[J].Frank M. Phillips;Steven R. Garfin.Spine.2005, 17S
[7]
Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty -: An In Vitro human cadaveric model [J].
Dmitriev, AE ;
Cunningham, BW ;
Hu, NB ;
Sell, G ;
Vigna, F ;
McAfee, PC .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (10) :1165-1172
[8]
Intervertebral disc arthroplasty [J].
Anderson, PA ;
Rouleau, JP .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (23) :2779-2786
[9]
Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single-level and bi-level [J].
Goffin, J ;
Van Calenbergh, F ;
van Loon, J ;
Casey, A ;
Kehr, P ;
Liebig, K ;
Lind, B ;
Logroscino, C ;
Sgrambiglia, R ;
Pointillart, V .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (24) :2673-2678
[10]
Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion [J].
Eck, JC ;
Humphreys, SC ;
Lim, TH ;
Jeong, ST ;
Kim, JG ;
Hodges, SD ;
An, HS .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (22) :2431-2434