Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: Implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care

被引：102

作者：

Aarts, Jos ^{[1
]}

Ash, Joan ^{[2
]}

Berg, Marc ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 DR Rotterdam

[2] Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098

来源：

International Journal of Medical Informatics | 2007年 / 76卷 / SUPPL. 1期

关键词：

Computerized; Computerized physician order entry; Hospital information systems; Medical records systems; Online systems; Qualitative research; Quality of care;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.009

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objective: To describe the perceived effect of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) on professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Design: Semi-structured interviews with experts involved in the design, implementation and evaluation of computerized physician order systems in the United States. Measurements: The interview transcripts were analyzed using six key concepts that identify context, professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Results: The interviews reveal the complexity of CPOE. Although providers enter the orders, others collaborate in the decision-making process. There is a profound impact on workflow beyond that of the provider. While quality of care is the main impetus for implementation, it remains terribly difficult to measure the impact on quality. Conclusions: A proper understanding of CPOE as a collaborative effort and the transformation of the health care activities into integrated care programs requires an understanding of how orders are created and processed, how CPOE as part of an integrated system can support the workflow, and how risks affecting patient care can be identified and reduced, especially during hand-offs in the workflow. © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：S4 / S13

页数：9

共 36 条

[1] To Err is Human, Building a Safer Health System, (2000)
[2] Eikel C., Delbanco S., John M., Eisenberg patient safety awards. The Leapfrog Group for Patient Safety: rewarding higher standards, J. Comm. J. Qual. Saf., 29, 12, pp. 634-639, (2003)
[3] Ash J.S., Gorman P.N., Seshadri V., Hersh W.R., Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 11, 2, pp. 95-99, (2004)
[4] Ash J.S., Gorman P.N., Hersh W.R., Physician order entry in U.S. hospitals, Proc. AMIA Symp., pp. 235-239, (1998)
[5] Massaro T.A., Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center. I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior, Acad. Med., 68, 1, pp. 20-25, (1993)
[6] Aarts J., Berg M., A tale of two hospitals: a sociotechnical appraisal of the introduction of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals, Medinfo, 11, pp. 999-1002, (2004)
[7] Aarts J., Doorewaard H., Berg M., Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 11, 3, pp. 207-216, (2004)
[8] Ash J.S., Gorman P.N., Lavelle M., Payne T.H., Massaro T.A., Frantz G.L., Et al., A cross-site qualitative study of physician order entry, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 10, 2, pp. 188-200, (2003)
[9] Goorman E., Berg M., Modelling nursing activities: electronic patient records and their discontents, Nurs. Inq., 7, 1, pp. 3-9, (2000)
[10] Gorman P.N., Lavelle M.B., Ash J.S., Order creation and communication in healthcare, Methods Inf. Med., 42, 4, pp. 376-384, (2003)

← 1 2 3 4 →