Institutional repository management models that support faculty research dissemination

被引：13

作者：

Armstrong, Michelle ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Albertsons Library, Boise State University, Boise, ID

来源：

OCLC Systems and Services | 2014年 / 30卷 / 01期

关键词：

Institutional repositories; Management models; Mediated deposit; Research dissemination;

D O I：

10.1108/OCLC-07-2013-0028

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Purpose: Research dissemination is a core mission for all universities. As a result, libraries should adopt this mission, utilizing institutional repositories services to support this goal. This paper aims to explore management models that institutional repositories can use for this purpose. Design/methodology/approach: By using research dissemination as a primary objective, individual management models are reviewed for their ability to accomplish this goal. Institutional repository services resulting from this purpose are also described. Findings: By adopting these kinds of models, libraries can develop new services that go beyond traditional library services and provide key support for the dissemination of a university's scholarship. Originality/value: This article challenges the existing ideology surrounding institutional repositories and helps frame these services as a core component for fulfilling an important university mission. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

引用

页码：43 / 51

页数：8

共 15 条

[1]

Armstrong M., Stringfellow J., Promoting faculty scholarship through the university author recognition bibliography at Boise State University, New Review of Academic Librarianship, 18, 2, pp. 165-175, (2012)

[2]

The university's role in the dissemination of research and scholarship - a call to action, Research Library Issues: A Bimonthly Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, No. 262, pp. 1-6, (2009)

[3]

Birkinshaw J., Goddard J., What is your management model?, MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 2, pp. 81-90, (2009)

[4]

Brewerton A., Re-skilling for research: Investigating the needs of researchers and how library staff can best support them, New Review of Academic Librarianship, 18, 1, pp. 96-110, (2012)

[5]

Davis P., Connolly M., Institutional repositories: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace, D-Lib Magazine, 13, 3-4, (2007)

[6]

Foster N., Gibbons S., Bell S., Lindahl D., Institutional repositories, policies, and disruption, (2007)

[7]

Gibbons S., Time horizon 2020: Library renaissance, (2010)

[8]

Hahn K.L., Research library publishing services: New options for university publishing, (2008)

[9]

Holdren J.P., Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research, (2013)

[10]

Lynch C., Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age, ARL, 226, pp. 1-7, (2003)

← 1 2 →