Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry

被引:134
作者
Adam Noah, J. [1 ]
Spierer, David K. [2 ]
Gu, Jialu [3 ]
Bronner, Shaw [4 ]
机构
[1] Brain Function Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511
[2] Division of Athletic Training, Health and Exercise Science, School of Health Professions, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, One University Plaza
[3] ADAM Center, Department of Physical Therapy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
关键词
Accelerometer; Pedometer; Physical activity;
D O I
10.3109/03091902.2013.831135
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Epidemic levels of inactivity are associated with chronic diseases and rising healthcare costs. To address this, accelerometers have been used to track levels of activity. The Fitbit and Fitbit Ultra are some of the newest commercially available accelerometers. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Fitbit and Fitbit Ultra. Twenty-three subjects were fitted with two Fitbit and Fitbit Ultra accelerometers, two industry-standard accelerometers and an indirect calorimetry device. Subjects participated in 6-min bouts of treadmill walking, jogging and stair stepping. Results indicate the Fitbit and Fitbit Ultra are reliable and valid for activity monitoring (step counts) and determining energy expenditure while walking and jogging without an incline. The Fitbit and standard accelerometers under-estimated energy expenditure compared to indirect calorimetry for inclined activities. These data suggest the Fitbit and Fitbit Ultra are reliable and valid for monitoring over-ground energy expenditure. © 2013 Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 462
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Colditz G.A., Economic costs of obesity and inactivity, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 31, (1999)
[2]  
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee, (2008)
[3]  
Blair S.N., Brodney S., Effects of physical inactivity and obesity on morbidity and mortality: Current evidence and research issues, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 31, (1999)
[4]  
Wei M., Kampert J.B., Barlow C.E., Nichaman M.Z., Gibbons L.W., Paffenbarger Jr. R.S., Blair S.N., Relationship between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in normalweight, overweight, and obese men, Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, pp. 1547-1553, (1999)
[5]  
Li T.Y., Rana J.S., Manson J.E., Willett W.C., Stampfer M.J., Colditz G.A., Rexrode K.M., Hu F.B., Obesity as compared with physical activity in predicting risk of coronary heart disease in women, Circulation, 113, pp. 499-506, (2006)
[6]  
Marshall S., Gyi D., Evidence of health risks from occupational sitting: Where do we stand?, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39, pp. 389-391, (2010)
[7]  
Van Uffelen J.G., Wong J., Chau J.Y., Van Der Ploeg H.P., Riphagen I., Gilson N.D., Burton N.W., Healy G.N., Thorp A.A., Clark B.K., Gardiner P.A., Dunstan D.W., Bauman A., Owen N., Brown W.J., Occupational sitting and health risks: A systematic review, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39, pp. 379-388, (2010)
[8]  
Owen N., Healy G.N., Matthews C.E., Dunstan D.W., Too much sitting: The population health science of sedentary behavior, Exercise & Sports Sciences Reviews, 38, pp. 105-113, (2010)
[9]  
Tammelin T., Lack of physical activity and excessive sitting: Health hazards for young people, Jornal de Pediatria, 85, pp. 283-285, (2009)
[10]  
Brage S., Wedderkopp N., Franks P.W., Andersen L.B., Froberg K., Reexamination of validity and reliability of the csa monitor in walking and running, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35, pp. 1447-1454, (2003)