Exploring the relationships between students' academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments

被引:52
作者
Yang, Chia-Chi [1 ]
Tsai, I-Chun [1 ]
Kim, Bosung [1 ]
Cho, Moon-Heum [1 ]
Laffey, James M. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Information Science and Learning Technologies, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211
关键词
Academic motivation; Intrinsic goal orientation; Online social interaction; Privacy; Self-efficacy; Social ability; Social navigation; Social presence; Task value;
D O I
10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.002
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This research explicates the construct of social ability and describes the relationship between students' academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments. Findings reveal perceived peers social presence, perceived written communication skills, perceived instructor social presence, comfort with sharing personal information, and social navigation as the five factors that define social ability. In addition, the multivariate multiple regression analyses indicate that different motivational constructs vary in their relationships with the multiple social ability factors. Intrinsic goal orientation is related to perceived peers social presence. Self-efficacy explains the variance of perceived instructor social presence and comfort with sharing personal information. Task value is associated with social navigation and both perceived peers and instructor social presence. Additional studies are needed to replicate the current findings and further explicate social ability in online learning, to continue to improve the social ability instrument, and to examine the value of other academic motivation beliefs in predicting social ability as well as that of social ability in predicting learning outcomes. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 286
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Allen E., Seaman J., Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States, 2005, (2005)
[2]  
Ames C., Archer J., Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 3, pp. 260-267, (1988)
[3]  
Bandura A., Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, (1997)
[4]  
Bures E.M., Amundsen C.C., Abrami P.C., Motivation to learn via computer conferencing: Exploring how task-specific motivation and CC expectations are related to student acceptance of learning via CC, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27, 3, pp. 249-264, (1998)
[5]  
Costello A.B., Osborn J.W., Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 7, (2005)
[6]  
Dourish P., Where the footprints lead: Tracking down other roles for social navigation, Social navigation of information space, pp. 15-34, (1999)
[7]  
Duncan T.G., McKeachie W.J., The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire, Educational Psychologist, 40, 2, pp. 117-128, (2005)
[8]  
Fredericksen E., Pickett A., Shea P., Pelz W., Swan K., Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY Learning Network, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4, 2, (2000)
[9]  
Greene B.A., Miller R.B., Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 2, pp. 181-192, (1996)
[10]  
Laffey J., Lin G., Lin Y., Assessing social ability in online learning environments, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17, 2, pp. 163-177, (2006)