Improved dust representation in the Community Atmosphere Model

被引:252
作者
Albani, S. [1 ,2 ]
Mahowald, N.M. [1 ]
Perry, A.T. [1 ]
Scanza, R.A. [1 ]
Zender, C.S. [3 ]
Heavens, N.G. [4 ]
Maggi, V. [2 ]
Kok, J.F. [1 ,5 ]
Otto-Bliesner, B.L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
[2] Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano
[3] Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA
[4] Department of Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Hampton University, Hampton, VA
[5] Now at Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
[6] National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
dust optical properties; dust size; last glacial maximum; m ineral dust; radiative forcing;
D O I
10.1002/2013MS000279
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aerosol-climate interactions constitute one of the major sources of uncertainty in assessing changes in aerosol forcing in the anthropocene as well as understanding glacial-interglacial cycles. Here we focus on improving the representation of mineral dust in the Community Atmosphere Model and assessing the impacts of the improvements in terms of direct effects on the radiative balance of the atmosphere. We simulated the dust cycle using different parameterization sets for dust emission, size distribution, and optical properties. Comparing the results of these simulations with observations of concentration, deposition, and aerosol optical depth allows us to refine the representation of the dust cycle and its climate impacts. We propose a tuning method for dust parameterizations to allow the dust module to work across the wide variety of parameter settings which can be used within the Community Atmosphere Model. Our results include a better representation of the dust cycle, most notably for the improved size distribution. The estimated net top of atmosphere direct dust radiative forcing is -0.23 ± 0.14 W/m2 for present day and -0.32 ± 0.20 W/m2 at the Last Glacial Maximum. From our study and sensitivity tests, we also derive some general relevant findings, supporting the concept that the magnitude of the modeled dust cycle is sensitive to the observational data sets and size distribution chosen to constrain the model as well as the meteorological forcing data, even within the same modeling framework, and that the direct radiative forcing of dust is strongly sensitive to the optical properties and size distribution used. © 2014. The Authors.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 570
页数:29
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]
Albani S., Delmonte B., Maggi V., Baroni C., Petit J.R., Stenni B., Mazzola C., Frezzotti M., Interpreting last glacial to Holocene dust changes at Talos Dome (East Antarctica): Implications for atmospheric variations from regional to hemispheric scales, Clim. Past, 8, pp. 741-750, (2012)
[2]
Albani S., Mahowald N.M., Delmonte B., Maggi V., Winckler G., Comparing modeled and observed changes in mineral dust transport and deposition to Antarctica between the Last Glacial Maximum and current climates, Clim. Dyn., 38, 9, pp. 1731-1755, (2012)
[3]
Alfaro S.C., Gomes L., Modeling mineral aerosol production by wind erosion: Emission intensities and aerosol size distributions in source areas, J. Geophys. Res., 106 D16, (2001)
[4]
Andronache C., Estimated variability of below-cloud aerosol removal by rainfall for observed aerosol size distributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, pp. 131-143, (2003)
[5]
Balkanski Y., Schultz M., Claquin T., Guibert S., Reevaluation of mineral aerosol radiative forcings suggests a better agreement with satellite and AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, pp. 81-95, (2007)
[6]
Balkanski Y.J., Jacob D.J., Gardner G.M., Graustein W.C., Turekian K.K., Transport and residence times of tropospheric aerosols inferred from a global three-dimensional simulation of 210Pb, J. Geophys. Res., 98 D11, (1993)
[7]
Bonan G.B., Levis S., Kergoat L., Oleson K.W., Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: An integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 16, 2, (2002)
[8]
Brady E.C., Otto-Bliesner B.L., Kay J.E., Rosenbloom N., Sensitivity to glacial forcing in the CCSM4, J. Clim., 26, pp. 1901-1925, (2013)
[9]
Cakmur R.V., Miller R.L., Perlwitz J., Geogdzhayev I.V., Ginoux P., Koch D., Kohfeld K.E., Tegen I., Zender C.S., Constraining the magnitude of the global dust cycle by minimizing the difference between a model and observations, J. Geophys. Res., 111, (2006)
[10]
Chylek P., Lohmann U., Aerosol radiative forcing and climate sensitivity deduced from the Last Glacial Maximum to Holocene transition, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, (2008)