人际—群际信任的差异:测量与影响因素

被引:8
作者
辛自强
高芳芳
张梅
机构
[1] 中央财经大学社会发展学院
关键词
人际—群际信任差异; 博弈范式; 决策; 群体;
D O I
10.13852/j.cnki.jshnu.2013.01.016
中图分类号
C912.3 [社会关系、社会约制];
学科分类号
1407 ;
摘要
在信任的博弈实验中,在博弈双方是个体还是群体时,他们表现出的信任水平是否不同呢?这是过去一、二十年研究的热点问题之一。以往大多数研究表明,群际信任显著低于人际信任,但也有部分研究发现了不同的结果。目前,关于人际—群际信任的差异主要采用投资博弈、礼物交换博弈、最后通牒博弈等任务进行测量,作者仔细梳理了基于不同任务的研究结果,并从群体因素(如群体身份、群体支持、责任分散等)和情境因素(如风险、沟通方式、信息)两个角度分析了可能影响人际—群际信任差异的因素。今后应该进一步改进研究设计,澄清人际—群际信任差异的表现,探讨各种可能的调节机制与影响因素。
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 82
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   惩罚和社会价值取向对公共物品两难中人际信任与合作行为的影响 [J].
王沛 ;
陈莉 .
心理学报, 2011, 43 (01) :52-64
[2]   信任的建立机制:关系运作与法制手段 [J].
彭泗清 .
社会学研究, 1999, (02) :55-68
[3]  
Individual Behavior and Group Membership: Comment[J] . Matthias Sutter.The American Economic Review . 2009 (5)
[4]  
Group and individual risk preferences: A lottery-choice experiment with self-employed and salaried workers[J] . David Masclet,Nathalie Colombier,Laurent Denant-Boemont,Youenn Lohéac.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization . 2009 (3)
[5]   Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered [J].
Luhan, Wolfgang J. ;
Kocher, Martin G. ;
Sutter, Matthias .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) :26-41
[6]  
Trust between individuals and groups: Groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy[J] . Tamar Kugler,Gary Bornstein,Martin G. Kocher,Matthias Sutter.Journal of Economic Psychology . 2007 (6)
[7]   Individual versus group behavior and the role of the decision making procedure in gift-exchange experiments [J].
Kocher M.G. ;
Sutter M. .
Empirica, 2007, 34 (1) :63-88
[8]  
The Risk-Based View of Trust: A Conceptual Framework[J] . T. K. Das,Bing-Sheng Teng.Journal of Business and Psychology . 2004 (1)
[9]   Reinforcement and Directional Learning in the Ultimatum Game with Responder Competition [J].
Brit Grosskopf .
Experimental Economics, 2003, 6 (2) :141-158
[10]   Responsibility and effort in an experimental labor market [J].
Charness, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2000, 42 (03) :375-384