临床常用线性评价方案的应用比较

被引:9
作者
吴蕙
吴炯
郭玮
潘柏申
机构
[1] 复旦大学附属中山医院检验科
关键词
线性; 评价; 方案;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R199 [各国卫生保健事业概况];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
目的熟悉美国临床实验室标准化委员会(NCCLS)EP6-A线性评价方案的应用;探讨美国临床病理学家协会设备委员会(CAP-IRC)法、EP6-P、EP6-A线性评价方案的区别及适用性。方法按照EP6-A对采用电化学发光法检测的甲胎蛋白(AFP)、速率法检测的尿素和丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、免疫比浊法检测的载脂蛋白B(apo B)和荧光定量聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测的乙型肝炎病毒脱氧核糖核酸(HBV DNA)进行线性评估;以尿素为例建立检测线性范围;比较CAP-IRC法、EP6-P、EP6-A方案评价apo B线性结果的异同。结果按照EP6-A,AFP、ALT和HBV DNA(对数)可直接判断呈线性;尿素的真实线性范围为5.305~46.975 mol/L。apo B目测法可判断呈线性;EP6-P判断呈非线性;CAP-IRC法判断呈非线性但在临床可接受范围;EP6-A判断呈非线性,但在一定范围内呈线性。结论推荐临床实验室使用EP6-A线性评价方案对各个检测项目进行线性评价保证检测结果的准确可靠。
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 581
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Evaluation of assay linearity[letter]. Tetrau ltG. C lin Chem . 1990
[2]  
Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative m easurem entprocedures:a statistical approach;Proposed gu ide-line. National Comm ittee for C lin ical Laboratory Standards. W ayne PA:EP6-P.NCCLS . 1986
[3]  
Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative m easurem entprocedures:a statistical approach;Approved gu ide-line. National Comm ittee for C lin ical Laboratory Standards. W ayne PA:EP6-A.NCCLS . 2003
[4]  
Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative m easurem entprocedures:a statistical approach;Proposed gu ide-line. National Comm ittee for C lin ical Laboratory Standards. . 1999
[5]  
G”test and evaluation of assay linearity[response to letter]. Tetrau lt G. C lin Chem . 1990
[6]  
Evaluation of lineari-ty in the c lin ical laboratory. Jhang JS,Chang CC,F ink D J. Arch Pathol LabM ed . 2004
[7]  
Evaluation of assay linearity[response toletter]. Passey RB. C lin Chem . 1990
[8]  
G”test and evaluation of assay linear-ity[letter]. Redondo FL. C lin Chem . 1990
[9]  
Evaluation of linearity using the new lyapproved NCCLS EP6-A protocol. Tholen DW. C lin LabNews . 2004
[10]  
A quantitative m easure ofnon liearity. Em anc ipator K,KrollMH. C lin Chem . 1993