急性冠状动脉综合征介入治疗4670例近期疗效的评价

被引:45
作者
韩雅玲
王耿
荆全民
王守力
王祖禄
王冬梅
马颖艳
栾波
机构
[1] 沈阳军区总医院心血管内科,沈阳军区总医院心血管内科,沈阳军区总医院心血管内科,沈阳军区总医院心血管内科,沈阳军区总医院心血管内科,沈阳军区总医院心血管内科,沈阳军区总医院心血管内科,沈阳军区总医院心血管内科沈阳,沈阳,沈阳,沈阳,沈阳,沈阳,沈阳,沈阳
关键词
心肌梗塞; 心绞痛,不稳定型; 放射学; 介入性;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R541.4 [冠状动脉(粥样)硬化性心脏病(冠心病)];
学科分类号
摘要
目的分析过去15年经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的近期临床疗效。方法1989年8月至2004年10月沈阳军区总医院心血管内科对4670例住院的ACS患者行PCI治疗,其中发病30d内的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者1750例(37.5%),不稳定心绞痛患者2920例(62.5%)。评价PCI的成功率、合并症及住院期间近期临床疗效。结果PCI总的病例成功率为98.1%(4579/4670),AMI行急诊PCI者梗死相关动脉开通率98.2%(825/840)。住院期间共死亡52例(总病死率1.1%),其中术中死亡2例(术中病死率0.04%)。总的PCI相关并发症发生率为6.5%(304/4670)。从入院至PCI时间为3.5d±2.1d,平均住院12d±8d。结论PCI治疗ACS成功率高,术中、术后死亡率和手术相关并发症发生率低,近期疗效好。
引用
收藏
页码:1040 / 1044
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Association of revascularisation with low mortality in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, a report from GUSTO IV-ACS. Ottervanger JP,Armstrong P,Barnathan ES,et al. European Heart Journal . 2004
[2]  
Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Keeley EC,Boura JA,Grines CL. The Lancet . 2003
[3]  
ACC/AHA2002guidelineupdateforthemanagementofpatientswithunstableangina andnon ST segmentelevationmyocardialinfarction——summary article:areportoftheAmericanCollegeofCardiology/American HeartAssociationtaskforceonpracticeguidelines(Committeeonthe Manageme. BraunwaldE,,AntmanEM,BeasleyJW,etal. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 2002
[4]  
Outcomesin patientswithacutenon Q wavemyocardialinfarctionrandomly assignedtoaninvasiveascomparedwithaconservativemanagement strategy.VeteransAffairsNon Q WaveInfarctionStrategiesin Hospital(VANQWISH)TrialInvestigators. BodenWE,O′RourkeRA,CrawfordMH,etal. The New England Journal of Medicine . 1998
[5]  
Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb /IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. Cannon CP,Weintraub WS,Demopoulos LA,et al. The New England Journal of Medicine . 2001
[6]  
Improving outcome over time of percutaneous interventions in unstable angina. Singh M,Rihal CS,Berger PB,et al. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 2000
[7]  
Delayed post-myocardial infarction invasive measures, helpful or harmful? A subgroup analysis. Yip HK,Wu CJ,Yang CH,et al. Chest . 2004
[8]  
Effectsoftissueplasminogenactivatorandacomparisonofearly invasiveandconservativestrategiesinunstableanginaandnon Q wavemyocardialinfarctionResultsoftheTIMIIIIBTrialThrombolysisinMyocardialIschemia. Circulation . 1994
[9]  
Comparison of outcomes of coronary stenting versus conventional coronary angioplasty in the department of veterans affairs medical centers. Maynard C,Wright SM,Every NR,et al. The American Journal of Cardiology . 2001
[10]  
Impact of coronary artery stents on mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction: metaanalysis of randomized trials comparing a strategy of routine stenting with that of balloon angioplasty. Al Suwaidi J,Holmes DR Jr,Salam AM,et al. American Heart Journal . 2004