温室气体排放权的财产权属性和制度化困境——对哈丁“公地悲剧”理论的反思

被引:4
作者
张磊
机构
[1] 广东外语外贸大学国际商务英语学院
关键词
公地悲剧; 财产权; 排放额;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D912.6 [自然资源与环境保护法];
学科分类号
030108 ;
摘要
哈丁的"公地悲剧"理论引导西方学者们从产权的角度论证温室气体减排的途径,并建议相关法律制度对排放实体所持有的排放额予以财产权确认。中国学者亦论证了排放额用益物权的属性。然而,以静态的财产制度处理动态的大气环境问题,予以确认和保护的财产权不免欠缺稳定性和持续性,并使政府不得不面临财产分配和财产征收是否合法和公允的质疑。并且,大气环境问题的综合性、远期性和国际性,亦决定了以国内财产制度应对大气环境容量问题的不足。
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 110
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
"The Several Futures of Property:Of Cyberspace and Folk Tales,Emission Trades and Ecosystems". Carol M.Rose. Minn.L.Rev . 1998
[2]  
When is Command-and-Control Efficient? Institutions,Technology, and the Comparative Efficiency of Alternative Regulatory Regimes forEnviornmental Protection. Daniel H Cole,Peter Z. Grossman. Wisconsin Law Review . 1999
[3]  
What’’s Property Got to Do with It?-A Review Essay of Pollution & Property:Comparing Ownership Institutions for Environmental Protection by Daniel Cole. David M. Driesen. Ecology L.Q . 2003
[4]  
Who Owns The Sky?. Gerald Torres. Pace Envtl. L. Rev .
[5]  
THE MISSING INSTRUMENT:DIRTY INPUT LIMITS. D.M.Driesen,,A.Sinden. Harvard Environmental Law Review . 2009
[6]  
The Western Climate Initiative:thefate of an experiment in subnational cross-borderenvironmental collaboration. Kazazis A. Brook-lyn Journal of International Law . 2012
[7]  
Roseland Plantation,LLC v.U.S.Fish&Wildlife Serv. 2006 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 29334,9-10 (W.D.La 2006) .
[8]  
Statement on the Settlement of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Lawsuit. http://www.dec.ny.gov/environmentdec/61956.html?showprintstyles . 2010
[9]  
Clearing The Air:Four Propositions about Property Rights and Enironmental Protection. Daniel H. Cole. Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’’y F . 1999
[10]  
The Cost of Transacting. Harold Demsetz. Q.J.Econ . 1968