农民工的就业与工资决定:教育与培训的重要性(英文)

被引:21
作者
王德文 [1 ]
蔡昉 [1 ]
张国庆 [2 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Population and Labor Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
[2] International Labor Organization Office for China and
关键词
农民工; 就业选择; 再流动; 教育与培训的回报率; 处理效应模型;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F323.6 [农业劳动力与农业人口]; F249.24 [劳动工资];
学科分类号
摘要
在城市劳动力市场上,农村劳动力根据个人的人力资本积累状况和当地的劳动力市场条件,在成为自我经营者和工资收入者之间进行就业选择。简单的Mincer工资方程回归结果显示,工资收入者比自我经营者的教育回报率高出2个百分点左右。在矫正了样本选择偏差之后,拓展的Mincer工资方程对工资收入者的教育回报率估计结果在5.3%-6.8%之间。从培训角度看,简单培训、短期培训和正规培训对农民工再流动都有显著作用,但简单培训对农民工的工资收入作用不显著,而短期培训和正规培训则对其工资收入有着重要的决定作用。此外,工资拖欠等权益保护问题也对农村劳动力再流动有重要影响。在处理农民工的个人异质性和教育内生性问题时,本文还发现父母受教育年限不是一个理想工具变量。
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 145
页数:23
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] 中国农村非农就业教育回报率的一致性[J]. Alan de Brauw,Scott Rozelle.中国劳动经济学. 2009(01)
  • [2] Economic returns to schooling in urban China, 1988 to 2001[J] . Junsen Zhang,Yaohui Zhao,Albert Park,Xiaoqing Song.Journal of Comparative Economics . 2005 (4)
  • [3] V-goods and the role of the urban informal sector in development
    Ranis, G
    Stewart, F
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 1999, 47 (02) : 259 - 288
  • [4] Rates of Return to Schooling in China[J] . Emily N. Johnson,Gregory C. Chow.Pacific Economic Review . 1997 (2)
  • [5] RETURNS TO EDUCATION IN CHINA
    BYRON, RP
    MANALOTO, EQ
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 1990, 38 (04) : 783 - 796
  • [6] AN INVESTIGATION OF THE LABOR-MARKET EARNINGS OF PANAMANIAN MALES EVALUATING THE SOURCES OF INEQUALITY
    HECKMAN, JJ
    HOTZ, VJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1986, 21 (04) : 507 - 542
  • [7] Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions. Heckman James J,Lance J. Lochner,Petra E. Todd. NBER Working Paper No. 9732 . 2003
  • [8] Education Investments and Returns. T. Schultz. .
  • [9] Privatization and enterprise wage structures during transition.:evidence from China‘s rural industries. Ho Samuel,Xiaoyuan Dong,Paul Bowles,Fiona MacPhail. Economics of Transition . 2002