会聚认知增强的伦理争论

被引：4

作者：

刘永谋 ^{[1
]}

陈翔宇 ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] 中国人民大学哲学院

[2] 中国人民大学

来源：

浙江社会科学 | 2018年 / 05期

关键词：

会聚技术; 认知增强; 伦理争论;

D O I：

10.14167/j.zjss.2018.05.015

中图分类号：

B82-054 [道德与心理];

学科分类号：

摘要：

认知增强越来越依赖纳米、生物、信息等技术的发展。基于会聚技术的认知增强尽管还处于实验室阶段,却已经引起诸多伦理争论,主要涉及增强与治疗的争议、主体性消解、认知多样与秩序以及社会公平失衡等问题,一种超人主义的积极伦理解释也成为当前会聚认知增强争论的焦点。对会聚认知增强的伦理反思既是为了加强对新兴技术的理解,也是对人类命运共同体的一种关切。

引用

页码：109 / 114+160 +160

页数：7

共 9 条

[1] Transcranial Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Enhance Attention
Reteig L.C.
Talsma L.J.
van Schouwenburg M.R.
Slagter H.A.
[J]. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2017, 1 (1) : 10 - 25
[2] A cortical neural prosthesis for restoring and enhancing memory
Berger, Theodore W.
Hampson, Robert E.
Song, Dong
Goonawardena, Anushka
Marmarelis, Vasilis Z.
Deadwyler, Sam A.
[J]. JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 8 (04)
[3] Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges[J] . Nick Bostrom,Anders Sandberg. Science and Engineering Ethics . 2009 (3)
[4] Brain Imaging and Brain Privacy: A Realistic Concern?[J] . Martha J. Farah,M. Elizabeth Smith,Cyrena Gawuga,Dennis Lindsell,Dean Foster. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience . 2009 (1)
[5] The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity[J] . INGMARPERSSON,JULIANSAVULESCU. Journal of Applied Philosophy . 2008 (3)
[6] Converging Cognitive Enhancements[J] . ANDERSSANDBERG,NICKBOSTROM. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences . 2007 (1)
[7] In defense of posthuman dignity
Bostrom, N
[J]. BIOETHICS, 2005, 19 (03) : 202 - 214
[8] Neuro-vascular central nervous recording/stimulating system: Using nanotechnology probes[J] . Rodolfo R. Llinás,Kerry D. Walton,Masayuki Nakao,Ian Hunter,Patrick A. Anquetil. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 2005 (2)
[9] More Than Human:Embracing the Promise of Biological Enhancement .2 Ramez Naam. Broadway books . 2005

← 1 →