企业创新性、创新程度、中断严重度和供应链弹性的关系研究

被引:13
作者
刘璠
机构
[1] 中南财经政法大学工商管理学院
关键词
企业创新性; 创新程度; 中断严重度; 供应链弹性; 关系;
D O I
10.16304/j.cnki.11-3952/f.2015.04.015
中图分类号
F271 [企业体制]; F274 [企业供销管理];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
随着现代商业环境日益动态化和复杂化,经济全球化、服务外包等因素使得供应链中断风险日益突出,本文旨在研究供应链中断环境下企业创新性、创新程度、中断严重度与供应链弹性之间的关系,通过构建四者之间关系的理论模型,提出相应的研究假设,以武汉地区企业为样本搜集数据进行实证检验,计量分析结果显示,企业创新和创新程度均与供应链弹性呈正相关,中断严重度与创新程度呈正相关,在此基础上提出相应的管理建议以期对供应链风险管理实践提供指导。
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 122
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
产业环境、创新意愿与光伏企业技术创新绩效研究.[D].姜健.渤海大学.2013, 08
[2]  
供应商激励对供应链绩效影响研究.[D].李彦良.浙江大学.2010, 08
[3]   Does firm innovativeness enable effective responses to supply chain disruptions? An empirical study [J].
Golgeci, Ismail ;
Ponomarov, Serhiy Y. .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2013, 18 (06) :604-617
[4]   Disruptions and supply networks: a multi-level, multi-theoretical relational perspective [J].
Greening, Phil ;
Rutherford, Christine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 22 (01) :104-126
[5]   Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience [J].
Ponomarov, Serhiy Y. ;
Holcomb, Mary C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 20 (01) :124-143
[6]  
Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains.[J].A. Michael Knemeyer;Walter Zinn;Cuneyt Eroglu.Journal of Operations Management.2008, 2
[7]   An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions [J].
Blackhurst, J ;
Craighead, CW ;
Elkins, D ;
Handfield, RB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (19) :4067-4081
[8]   Innovation generation in supply chain relationships: A conceptual model and research propositions [J].
Roy, S ;
Sivakumar, K ;
Wilkinson, IF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2004, 32 (01) :61-79
[9]  
Building the Resilient Supply Chain.[J].Martin Christopher;Helen Peck.The International Journal of Logistics Management.2004, 2
[10]   Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation, and performance in small firms [J].
Verhees, FJHM ;
Meulenberg, MTG .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2004, 42 (02) :134-154