网络同伴互评中反馈评语的类型与效果分析

被引:27
作者
马志强
王靖
许晓群
龙琴琴
机构
[1] 江南大学教育信息化研究中心
关键词
同伴互评; 互评反馈; 在线学习评价;
D O I
10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2016.01.010
中图分类号
G434 [计算机化教学];
学科分类号
040110 ;
摘要
本研究的目的在于分析网络同伴互评活动中,评语类型、学生对评语的可用性判断与最终评语采纳之间的关系。研究将两轮网络同伴互评活动中形成的评语文本作为分析对象,综合运用内容分析、回归分析等方法探索三者之间的关系。主要研究结论为:在情感、认知与元认知三类评语中,学习者对否定评语的采纳多于肯定评语,对直接提供改进的评语采纳多于仅提出个人评论的评语,对知识技能核查的评语多于反思类评语;学生对评语的可用性判断会显著影响其采纳评语、修改作品。讨论部分基于研究结论,给出了教师引导同伴互评评语的策略,并提出后续研究应从扩展同伴互评涉及的学科范围、量化分析评语质量、对评语内容作深入分析等维度展开,以深入探寻影响同伴评语采纳的相关因素。
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 71
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   基于同侪互评的在线学习评价研究综述 [J].
马志强 ;
王雪娇 ;
龙琴琴 .
远程教育杂志, 2014, 32 (04) :86-92
[2]  
Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity[J] . Kun-Hung Cheng,Jyh-Chong Liang,Chin-Chung Tsai.The Internet and Higher Education . 2015
[3]  
Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback[J] . Jingyan Lu,Nancy Law.Instructional Science . 2012 (2)
[4]  
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions[J] . Learning and Instruction . 2009 (4)
[5]   An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment [J].
Chen, Ying-Chih ;
Tsai, Chin-Chung .
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 46 (01) :105-117
[6]  
The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education[J] . J. van der Pol,B.A.M. van den Berg,W.F. Admiraal,P.R.J. Simons.Computers & Education . 2008 (4)
[7]   An analysis of peer assessment online discussions within a course that uses project-based learning [J].
Hou, Huei-Tse ;
Chang, Kuo-En ;
Sung, Yao-Ting .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2007, 15 (03) :237-251
[8]  
On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course[J] . Sheng-Chau Tseng,Chin-Chung Tsai.Computers & Education . 2006 (4)
[9]  
The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course[J] . Frank Tuzi.Computers and Composition . 2004 (2)