MAU程序和自由讨论的群体决策质量比较

被引:6
作者
朱华燕
郑全全
机构
[1] 浙江大学心理学系
基金
浙江省自然科学基金;
关键词
MAU决策程序; 自由讨论; 信息不分享; 群体决策质量;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C934 [决策学];
学科分类号
摘要
采用实验室研究方法 ,比较了在信息不分享条件下多特征效用模型 (MAU)决策程序和自由讨论对群体决策质量的影响 ,并对影响MAU决策质量的主要因素进行了初步探讨。结果发现 :(1)MAU程序可以较好地克服群体动力学方面的一些消极影响 ,表现出挖掘信息 (尤其是非分享信息 )的充分性。但MAU程序在被试的态度和社会交互作用等心理效标上并未显示出优势 ;(2 )在MAU条件下 ,群体规模的增大对分享和非分享信息的讨论量无显著影响。而任务难度效应要和群体规模一起才能起到作用
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 557
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Stewart D & Stasser.Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision-making. Journal of Personality . 1995
  • [2] Stasser G,Stewart D.Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality . 1992
  • [3] Stasser G,Titus W.Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group decision. Journal of Personality . 1987
  • [4] Timmermans D,Vlek C.An evaluation study of the effectiveness of multi-attribute support as a function of problem complexity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes . 1994
  • [5] Timmermans D,Vlek C.Effects on the decision quality of supporting multi-attribute evaluation in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes . 1996
  • [6] Stasser G,Titus W.Pooling of unshared information in group decision making. Journal of Personality . 1985
  • [7] Davis JH.Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social schemes. Psychological Review . 1973
  • [8] Stasser G,Taylor LA,Hanna C.Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three-and six-person groups. Journal of Personality . 1989
  • [9] Benbasat L,Lim LH.The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research . 1993
  • [10] Lam SS,Schaubroeck J.Improving group decisions by better pooling information: a comparative advantage of group decision support systems. Journal of Applied Psychology . 2000