不同土地利用形式下表土有机碳含量和密度特征的研究

被引:10
作者
周毅 [1 ]
钟锡均 [1 ]
郭乐东 [1 ]
甘先华 [1 ]
黎艳明 [1 ]
张坤洪 [2 ]
李召青 [1 ]
梁远楠 [2 ]
辛凤坪 [1 ]
张卫强 [1 ]
机构
[1] 广东省林业科学研究院
[2] 肇庆市林业科学研究院
关键词
土地利用变化; 表层土壤; 有机碳含量; 土壤有机碳密度;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S153.6 [土壤成分];
学科分类号
090301 [土壤学];
摘要
通过对西江流域肇庆市三叉顶自然保护区典型样地调查,对比分析了林地(针阔混交林、竹林、马尾松林)、农用地(果园、稻田、旱地)与邻近荒地的0~20 cm土壤有机碳含量和密度特征及其影响因子。结果表明:(1)有机碳含量大小顺序为林地(20.71±5.24 g.kg-1)>农用地(13.50±6.05 g.kg-1)>荒地(12.87±4.20 g.kg-1)。林地比农用地、荒地表土有机碳含量分别高出53.35%和60.83%。林地表土有机碳含量极显著高于农用地和荒地,而农用地和荒地间则无显著差异。表土有机碳密度差异极显著,有机碳密度大小顺序为林地(3.09±0.88 kg.m-2)>荒地(2.99±0.93 kg.m-2)>农用地(2.28±1.01 kg.m-2)。(2)针阔混交林、竹林、马尾松叶林3种林分类型的表土有机碳含量、密度的大小顺序均为针阔混交林>竹林>马尾松林;在有机碳含量方面,针阔混交林与马尾松林有显著差异;针阔混交林、竹林均与荒地有显著差异,而马尾松林与荒地则无显著差异。在有机碳密度方面,针阔混交林与马尾松林有显著差异。(3)3种农用地有机碳含量大小顺序为果园>稻田>旱地,果园与旱地之间有显著差异,旱地有机碳含量比果园低41.91%,旱地与水稻田之间无显著差异,三者与荒地均无显著差异。有机碳密度顺序有所变化,大小顺序为果园>旱地>稻田,三者之间均无显著差异,但旱地、水稻田均与荒地有显著差异。(4)土壤氮水平、电导率对林地、农用地土壤碳固定有正效应,而容重则有负效应;而受施肥和耕作等因素影响,农用地的表土有机碳含量还与石砾含量显著负相关;荒地的土壤有机碳含量则仅与容重显著负相关。
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
土壤理化分析.[M].中国科学院南京土壤研究所 编.上海科学技术出版社.1978,
[2]
Soil change and carbon storage in longleaf pine stands planted on marginal agricultural lands [J].
Markewitz, D ;
Sartori, F ;
Craft, C .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2002, 12 (05) :1276-1285
[3]
Effects of afforestation on organic carbon; nitrogen and sulfur concentrations in New Zealand hill country soils.[J].F.M Groenendijk;L.M Condron;W.C Rijkse.Geoderma.2002, 1
[4]
Change in soil carbon following afforestation.[J].K.I. Paul;P.J. Polglase;J.G. Nyakuengama;P.K. Khanna.Forest Ecology and Management.2002, 1
[5]
Soil organic carbon as affected by afforestation with Eucalyptus and Pinus in the Cerrado region of Brazil.[J].Yuri.L Zinn;Dimas V.S Resck;José E da Silva.Forest Ecology and Management.2002, 1
[6]
Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land.[J].Lars Vesterdal;Eva Ritter;Per Gundersen.Forest Ecology and Management.2002, 1
[7]
Soil carbon stocks after forest conversion to tree plantations in lowland Amazonia; Brazil.[J].C.Ken Smith;Francisco de Assis Oliveira;Henry L Gholz;Anadilza Baima.Forest Ecology and Management.2002, 1
[8]
Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soil carbon and nitrogen? a review of the literature [J].
Murty, D ;
Kirschbaum, MUF ;
McMurtrie, RE ;
McGilvray, A .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2002, 8 (02) :105-123
[9]
Carbon and nitrogen stocks in the soils of the Amazon Region.[J].N.H Batjes;J.A Dijkshoorn.Geoderma.1999, 3
[10]
Regional estimates of carbon sequestration potential: linking the Rothamsted Carbon Model to GIS databases [J].
Falloon, PD ;
Smith, P ;
Smith, JU ;
Szabo, J ;
Coleman, K ;
Marshall, S .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1998, 27 (03) :236-241