专利质量指标中“被引次数”的深度剖析

被引:69
作者
万小丽
机构
[1] 不详
[2] 华南理工大学知识产权学院
[3] 不详
关键词
专利质量; 专利引文; 被引次数; 维持时间;
D O I
10.13833/j.cnki.is.2014.01.022
中图分类号
G353.1 [情报资料的分析和研究];
学科分类号
摘要
深度剖析专利质量指标中"被引次数"的原理、效力、缺陷和修正方法有利于研究者和使用者更恰当地予以应用。该指标虽然已被广泛应用,但仍然面临时间截面、引证膨胀、技术领域差异、被引质量等问题;现有的修正方法在一定程度上可以起到缓解作用,但还有较大的改进空间。
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
The evidence of systematic noise in non-patent references: A study of New Zealand companies’ patents[J] . Zi-Lin He,Min Deng.Scientometrics . 2007 (1)
[2]   Measuring patent assessment quality - Analyzing the degree and kind of (in)consistency in patent offices' decision making [J].
Burke, Paul F. ;
Reitzig, Markus .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (09) :1404-1430
[3]  
Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology[J] . Poh Kam Wong,Yuen Ping Ho,Casey K. Chan.Scientometrics . 2007 (3)
[4]  
Assessing the R&D Management of a Firm in Terms of Speed and Science Linkage: Evidence from the US Patents[J] . SadaoNagaoka.Journal of Economics & Management Strategy . 2007 (1)
[5]  
An in-depth empirical analysis of patent citation counts using zero-inflated count data model: The case of KIST[J] . Yong-Gil Lee,Jeong-Dong Lee,Yong-Il Song,Se-Jun Lee.Scientometrics . 2007 (1)
[6]   Indirect patent citations [J].
Atallah, Gamal ;
Rodriguez, Gabriel .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 67 (03) :437-465
[7]   Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis [J].
von Wartburg, I ;
Teichert, T ;
Rost, K .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (10) :1591-1607
[8]  
International Knowledge Flows: Evidence From Patent Citations[J] . Adam B. Jaffe,Manuel Trajtenberg.Economics of Innovation and New Technology . 1999 (1-2)
[9]  
Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool[J] . M.M.S. Karki.World Patent Information . 1998 (4)
[10]  
University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention[J] . Manuel Trajtenberg,Rebecca Henderson,Adam Jaffe.Economics of Innovation and New Technology . 1997 (1)