德国历史学派与19世纪经济学方法论之争的启示

被引:14
作者
何蓉
机构
[1] 中国社会科学院社会学所博士后
关键词
the Historical School; the Methodenstreit; Gustav Schmoller; theory and history; induction and deduction;
D O I
10.15992/j.cnki.31-1123/c.2005.03.008
中图分类号
F095.16 [];
学科分类号
摘要
In the mid-19th century, out of their dissatisfaction with the neglect of the economic theories about other countries' experiences in the British classic economics, the economists in the German Historical School worked hard to construct an economic theory that was congruent to the developmental stage in their own country's culture and history. Their deeply-cherished concern about the reality in a transitional era when Germany was approaching modernization drove them to propose that the living condition of the working class be improved by the power of the state. In the late 80's of the same century, the Methodenstreit of German Historical School versus the Austrian School broke out, after which the mainstream economics was well on its way in terms of theoretical refinement and scrutiny, whereas the influence from the Historical School gradually subsided. Even so, the lessons from the Historical School are still enlightening to research in contemporary social sciences. This paper describes the unique basics in the theory building of the Historical School; explains the background and meaning of its academic origin, research methodology, and the Methodenstreit; and from there, discusses implications for contemporary social sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 186
页数:20
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] 历史主义的由来及其含义
    格奥尔格·伊格尔斯
    [J]. 史学理论研究, 1998, (01) : 70 - 87+112
  • [2] 欧洲自由主义史.[M].(意)圭多·德·拉吉罗(GuidodeRuggiero)著;杨军译;.吉林人民出版社.2001,
  • [3] 经济学的认识论问题.[M].(奥)路德维希·冯·米塞斯(LudwigVonMises)著;梁小民译;.经济科学出版社.2001,
  • [4] 政治经济学的范围与方法.[M].(英)约翰·内维尔·凯恩斯(JohnNevillKeynes)著;党国英;刘惠译;.华夏出版社.2001,
  • [5] 西方史学史.[M].张广智;陈新撰稿;张广智主著;.复旦大学出版社.2000,
  • [6] 西方人文主义传统.[M].(英)阿伦·布洛克(AlanBullock)著;董东山译;.三联书店.1997,
  • [7] 历史方法的国民经济学讲义大纲.[M].(德)威廉·罗雪尔(WilhelmRoscher)著;朱绍文译;.商务印书馆.1981,