高管团队价值观、团队氛围对冲突的影响

被引：19

作者：

孙海法

刘海山

机构：

[1] 中山大学管理学院

来源：

商业经济与管理 | 2007年 / 12期

关键词：

高管团队; 冲突; 价值观; 团队氛围;

D O I：

10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2007.12.006

中图分类号：

F272 [企业计划与经营决策];

学科分类号：

1201 ;

摘要：

文章实证分析了高管团队成员的社会价值观和团队氛围对冲突的影响。结果表明,高管团队的绩效观和集体主义观与任务冲突有正向联系,集体主义观异质性和绩效观异质性抑制任务冲突,利己权力观异质性引起任务冲突。研究发现高管团队开放性和信任构成的团队氛围与任务冲突有正向联系,总经理的集体主义导向与任务冲突正相关。研究没有发现价值观与关系冲突联系的直接证据,关系冲突更可能与情绪因素相联系。

引用

页码：32 / 38

页数：7

共 10 条

[1] “空降兵”与原管理团队的冲突及对企业绩效的影响 [J].

刘学 .

管理世界, 2003, (06) :105-113

[2] 社会心理领域的价值观研究述要 [J].

杨宜音 .

中国社会科学, 1998, (02) :82-93

[3] Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration [J].

Simsek, Z ;

Veiga, JF ;

Lubatkin, MH ;

Dino, RN .

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 48 (01) :69-84

[4]

Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition[J] . Mason A. Carpenter.Journal of Management . 2004 (6)

[5] How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism [J].

Chen, CC ;

Chen, XP ;

Meindl, JR .

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (02) :285-304

[6] The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict [J].

Amason, AC ;

Sapienza, HJ .

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1997, 23 (04) :495-516

[7]

Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams[J] . Allen C. Amason.The Academy of Management Journal . 1996 (1)

[8]

Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making[J] . David M. Schweiger,William R. Sandberg,Paula L. Rechner.The Academy of Management Journal . 1989 (4)

[9]

Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory[J] . Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,L. J. Bourgeois.The Academy of Management Journal . 1988 (4)

[10]

Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers[J] . Donald C. Hambrick,Phyllis A. Mason.The Academy of Management Review . 1984 (2)

← 1 →