GRADE系统方法学进展

被引：33

作者：

陈耀龙

杨克虎

姚亮

田金徽

拜争刚

马彬

李秀霞

机构：

[1] 兰州大学循证医学中心,GRADE中国中心

来源：

中国循证儿科杂志 | 2013年 / 8卷 / 01期

关键词：

中华人民共和国; 临床实践指南; GRADE; 工作组; 卫生技术评估;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R-03 [];

学科分类号：

摘要：

<正>卫生系统中证据推荐分级的评估、制订与评价(The Grading of Recommendations Assessment,Development and Evaluation,GRADE)系统是循证医学的最新进展,是当前证据质量和推荐强度分级的国际标准之一,适用于临床实践指南、系统评价和卫生技术评估[1]。GRADE系统被逐渐介绍和引入中国,已有中文的系统评价和临床实践指南采用

引用

页码：64 / 65

页数：2

共 26 条

[1] Uncertainties in baseline risk estimates and confidence in treatment effects. Spencer FA,Iorio A,You J,et al. British Medical Journal . 2012
[2] Could GRADE approach be applied into systematic reviews of etiological studies. Li L,Sun T,Tian J,et al. 20th Cochrane Colloquium . 2012
[3] http://www.gradepro.org/china2012 . 2013
[4] can China master the guideline challenge?. Yang KH,Chen YL,Li YP,et al. Health Research Policy and Systems . 2013
[5] Quality assessment of clinical guidelines in China:1993-2010. Chen YL,Yao L,Xiao XJ,et al. Chinese Medical Journal . 2012
[6] Antivirals for treatment of influenza:a systematic review and meta-analysis of observa-tional studies. Hsu J,Santesso N,Mustafa R,et al. Annals of Internal Medicine . 2012
[7] Handbook for Supporting the Development of Health System Guidance. Bosch-Capblanch X. . 2011
[8] Challenges in applying GRADE to health systems and public health interventions. Rehfuess E,Pantoja T. 20th Cochrane Colloquium . 2012
[9] Challenges of assessing the quality of scientific evidence for public health interventions. Ljungdahl S,Richardson M,Bremberg S,et al. 20th Cochrane Colloquium . 2012
[10] New developments in GRADE. Jaeschke R. G-I-N Conference 2012 . 2012

← 1 2 3 →