Effects of Bacillus subtilis CSL2 on the composition and functional diversity of the faecal microbiota of broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella Gallinarum

被引:17
作者
Ju Kyoung Oh [1 ]
Edward Alain BPajarillo [1 ]
Jong Pyo Chae [1 ]
In Ho Kim [1 ]
Dong Soo Yang [2 ]
DaeKyung Kang [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University
[2] Abson Bio Chem, Inc
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S831.5 [饲料与营养];
学科分类号
090502 [动物营养与饲料科学];
摘要
Background: The chicken gastrointestinal tract contains a diverse microbiota whose composition and structure play important roles in gut functionality. In this study, microbial shifts resulting from feed supplementation with Bacillus subtilis CSL2 were evaluated in broilers challenged and unchallenged with Salmonella Gallinarum. To analyse bacterial community composition and functionality, 454 GS-FLX pyrosequencing of 16 S r RNA gene amplicons was performed.Results: The Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology(QIIME) pipeline was used to analyse changes in the faecal microbiota over a 24-h period. A total of 718,204 sequences from broiler chickens were recorded and analysed. At the phylum level, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were the predominant bacterial taxa. In Salmonellainfected chickens(SC), Bacteroidetes were more highly abundant compared to control(NC) and Bacillus-treated(BT)chickens. At the genus level, in the NC and BT groups, Lactobacil us was present at high abundance, and the abundance of Turicibacter, unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, and Bacteroides increased in SC broilers. Furthermore, taxon-independent analysis showed that the SC and BT groups were compositional y distinct at the end of the 24-h period. Further analysis of functional properties showed that B. subtilis CSL2 administration increased gut-associated energy supply mechanisms(i.e. carbohydrate transport and metabolism) to maintain a stable microbiota and protect gut integrity.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that S. Gallinarum infection and B. subtilis CSL2 supplementation in the diet of broiler chickens influenced the diversity, composition, and functional diversity of the faecal microbiota. Moreover, the findings offer significant insights to understand potential mechanisms of Salmonel a infection and the mode of action of probiotics in broiler chickens.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 458
页数:9
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]
The effects of the supplementation of Bacillus subtilis RX7 and B2A strains on the performance, blood profiles, intestinal Salmonella concentration, noxious gas emission, organ weight and breast meat quality of broiler challenged with Salmonella typhimurium [J].
Park, J. H. ;
Kim, I. H. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2015, 99 (02) :326-334
[2]
Effects of probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 11181 administration on swine fecal microbiota diversity and composition using barcoded pyrosequencing.[J].Edward Alain B. Pajarillo;Jong Pyo Chae;Marilen P. Balolong;Hyeun Bum Kim;Chan-Soo Park;Dae-Kyung Kang.Animal Feed Science and Technology.2015,
[3]
Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease [J].
Stanley, Dragana ;
Hughes, Robert J. ;
Moore, Robert J. .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 98 (10) :4301-4310
[4]
Characterization of Bacillus spp. strains for use as probiotic additives in pig feed [J].
Larsen, Nadja ;
Thorsen, Line ;
Kpikpi, Elmer Nayra ;
Stuer-Lauridsen, Birgitte ;
Cantor, Mette Dines ;
Nielsen, Bea ;
Brockmann, Elke ;
Derkx, Patrick M. F. ;
Jespersen, Lene .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 98 (03) :1105-1118
[5]
The microbiome of the chicken gastrointestinal tract.[J].Carl J. Yeoman;Nicholas Chia;Patricio Jeraldo;Maksim Sipos;Nigel D. Goldenfeld;Bryan A. White.Animal Health Research Reviews.2012, 1
[6]
Salmonella SPI-1-mediated neutrophil recruitment during enteric colitis is associated with reduction and alteration in intestinal microbiota [J].
Sekirov, Inna ;
Gill, Navkiran ;
Jogova, Maria ;
Tam, Nicola ;
Robertson, Marilyn ;
de Llanos, Rosa ;
Li, Yuling ;
Finlay, Brett B. .
GUT MICROBES, 2010, 1 (01) :30-41