对作为经验的欧美人类种系基因编辑立法的省思

被引:7
作者
唐伟华
机构
[1] 青岛大学法学院
关键词
欧美; 人类种系修饰; 基因编辑; 伦理情境; 立法;
D O I
10.19524/j.cnki.10-1009/g3.2019.04.057
中图分类号
D912.1 [行政法];
学科分类号
030103 ;
摘要
面对人类种系基因编辑带来的伦理争议,如何借鉴西方立法经验受到重视。欧美国家的制度经验主要立足于其自身的文化传统和伦理情境。是否需要将人类种系基因修饰视为禁忌,有待于商榷。更重要的是,西方的伦理及法制经验的"普遍主义"和"地方性"还需要进一步讨论。
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 72
页数:16
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   人工受孕体在当代意大利立法和判例中的地位 [J].
徐国栋 .
华东政法大学学报, 2015, 18 (05) :15-25
[2]   Should human germ line editing be allowed? Some suggestions on the basis of the existing regulatory framework [J].
de Miguel Beriain, Inigo .
BIOETHICS, 2019, 33 (01) :105-111
[3]  
CRISPR/Cas9 GENE-EDITING: RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES, CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS[J] . Fani Memi,Aglaia Ntokou,Irinna Papangeli. Seminars in Perinatology . 2018
[4]  
Correction of β-thalassemia mutant by base editor in human embryos[J] . Puping Liang,Chenhui Ding,Hongwei Sun,Xiaowei Xie,Yanwen Xu,Xiya Zhang,Ying Sun,Yuanyan Xiong,Wenbin Ma,Yongxiang Liu,Yali Wang,Jianpei Fang,Dan Liu,Zhou Songyang,Canquan Zhou,Junjiu Huang. Protein & Cell . 2017 (11)
[5]  
Mitochondrial replacement therapy: born in the USA: the untold story of a conceptual breakthrough[J] . Eli Y. Adashi,I. Glenn Cohen. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . 2017
[6]  
Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Biomedicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine[J] . Council of Europe.. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal . 1997 (3)
[7]  
Human embryo experimentation: The ethical debate[J] . Lynn Gillam. Bioethics News . 1993 (4)
[8]  
The Family,Medical Decision-Making,and Biotechnology .2 Engelhardt,H,Chuen Lee,Shui. Springer . 2007
[9]  
Gene Therapy:Prospective Technology Assessment in its Societal Context .2 Thomas A. . 2013