稳定型与不稳定型心绞痛患者电子束CT冠状动脉钙化检测的比较

被引:13
作者
杜志民
罗初凡
胡承恒
伍贵富
李怡
冯君
马虹
机构
[1] 中山医科大学附属第一医院心内科!广东广州
[2] 中山医科大学附属第一医院
关键词
心绞痛/病理学; 冠状动脉疾病/病理学; 钙质沉着症; 体层摄影术,X线计算机;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R541.4 [冠状动脉(粥样)硬化性心脏病(冠心病)];
学科分类号
摘要
【目的】比较稳定型心绞痛 (SAP)与不稳定型心绞痛 (UAP)患者冠状动脉 (冠脉 )钙化 (CAC)的不同模式。【方法】 6 7例SAP与 94例UAP患者 ,行选择性冠脉造影和电子束CT(EBCT)检查 ,分析两组CAC积分 (CS)的差异及其与冠脉狭窄程度之间的关系。【结果】①SAP组CAC检测阳性率 ( 10 0 % )显著高于UAP组 ( 87 2 3% ) (P <0 0 5 )。②SAP组CAC积分显著高于UAP组 ,其自然对数转换值 [ln (CS + 1) ]的均数按心脏整体计算为 ( 5 2 4± 1 72 )对 ( 3 13± 1 96 ) (P <0 0 0 1) ,按冠脉分支计算为 ( 3 2 8± 2 0 8)对 ( 1 6 8± 1 6 2 ) (P <0 0 0 1)。③在每一相同的年龄段内比较 ,SAP组的CAC程度均明显高于UAP组。④ln (CS + 1)与冠脉狭窄程度在两组均呈正相关 ,但SAP组相关程度相对较好 ;SAP组重度狭窄的冠脉多发生重度或中度钙化 ,而UAP组重度狭窄的冠脉则多数无钙化或仅有轻度钙化。【结论】稳定型与不稳定型心绞痛患者冠脉钙化存在不同的模式 ,前者冠脉钙化大多较为严重 ,钙化积分与冠脉狭窄程度的相关性较好 ,而后者钙化程度多数较轻 ,钙化积分与冠脉狭窄程度的相关性很差
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 140
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Structuredependent dynamic mechanical behavior of fibrous caps from human atherosclerotic plaques. Lee R T,Grodzinsky A J,Frank E H,et al. Circulation . 1991
[2]  
Compari sonofcoronarycalciuminstableanginapectorisandinfirstacutemyocardialinfarctionutilizingdoublehelicalcomputerizedtomography. ShemeshJ,StrohCI,TenenbaumA,etal. The American Journal of Cardiology . 1998
[3]  
Independent and incremental value of coronary artery calcium for predicting the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: comparison with cardiac risk factors and radionuclide perfusion imaging. Schmermund A,Denktas A E,Rumberger J A,et al. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 1999
[4]  
Coronaryarterycalciumareabyelectron beamcomputedtomographyandcoronaryatheroscleroticplaquearea :ahistopathologiccorrelativestudy. RumbergerJA,SimonsDB,FitzpatrickLA,etal. Circulation . 1995
[5]  
Determi nantsandcorrelatesoftargetlesioncalciumincoronaryarterydisease :aclinical,angiographicandintravascularultrasoundstudy. MintzGS,PichardAD,PopmaJJ,etal. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 1997
[6]  
Coronary calcium does not accurately predict near-term future coronary events in high-risk adults. Detrano R C,Wong N D,Doherty T M,et al. Circulation . 1999
[7]  
Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events: comparison of two protocols. Secci A,Wong N,Tang W,et al. Circulation . 1997
[8]  
Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries: 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. Arad Y,Spadaro L A,Goodman K,et al. Circulation . 1996
[9]  
Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. Agatston AS,Janowitz WR,Hildner FJ,et al. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 1990
[10]  
Adefi nitionofadvancedtypesofatheroscleroticlesionsandahistologicalclassificationofatherosclerosis:areportfromtheCommitteeonVascularLesionsoftheCouncilonAtherosclerosis ,AmericanHeartAssociation. StaryHC,ChandlerAB,DinsmoreRE,etal. Circulation . 1995