“琼斯批评”对内生增长理论发展的影响

被引:1
作者
刘安国 [1 ]
杨开忠 [2 ]
机构
[1] 北京化工大学经济管理学院
[2] 北京大学政府管理学院
关键词
琼斯批评; 内生增长; 规模效应;
D O I
10.13504/j.cnki.issn1008-2700.2008.04.009
中图分类号
F061.2 [增长经济学]; F224 [经济数学方法];
学科分类号
0201 ; 0701 ; 070104 ;
摘要
早期内生增长理论的最重要的结论之一是一定政策变量的永久性变化对经济增长率产生永久性影响。"琼斯批评"指出:AK类内生增长模型和基于R&D的内生增长模型的理论含义与时间序列检验的实证结果不一致,这两类模型有误导作用,应当被否定。本文结合"琼斯批评"的理论背景、主要内容和观点扼要地评述其对内生增长理论的发展所起的促进作用,同时针对其立论中的不尽合理的部分提出作者的批评。
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 108
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Rent protection as a barrier to innovation and growth [J].
Dinopoulos, Elias ;
Syropoulos, Constantinos .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2007, 32 (02) :309-332
[2]  
Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R. & D. Inputs Growing[J] . Peter Howitt.Journal of Political Economy . 1999 (4)
[3]  
Growth: With or without Scale Effects?[J] . Charles I. Jones.The American Economic Review . 1999 (2)
[4]   Endogenous growth without scale effects [J].
Segerstrom, PS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 88 (05) :1290-1310
[5]   Schumpeterian growth without scale effects [J].
Dinopoulos E. ;
Thompson P. .
Journal of Economic Growth, 1998, 3 (4) :313-335
[6]   Technological change and population growth [J].
Peretto P.F. .
Journal of Economic Growth, 1998, 3 (4) :283-311
[7]   Growth without scale effects [J].
Young, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (01) :41-63
[8]   LONG-RUN POLICY ANALYSIS AND LONG-RUN GROWTH [J].
REBELO, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (03) :500-521
[9]   EXTERNALITIES AND GROWTH ACCOUNTING [J].
BENHABIB, J ;
JOVANOVIC, B .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1991, 81 (01) :82-113
[10]   ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE [J].
ROMER, PM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (05) :S71-S102