共 7 条
[1]
Safety and efficacy oftransradial vs transfemoral arterial primary coronary angioplastyfor acute myocardial infarction:single-center experience. YIP H K,CHUNG S Y,CHAI H T,et al. Circulation Journal . 2009
[2]
Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Keeley EC,Boura JA,Grines CL,et al. Lancet,The . 2003
[3]
Comparative study on tran-sradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneouscoronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardialinfarction. HOU L,WEI Y D,LI W M,et al. Saudi Medical Journal . 2010
[4]
Comparative study ontransradial approach vs transfemoral approach in primary stentimplantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction:re-sults of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective uni-center randomization for access sites(TEMPURA)tr. SAITO S,TANAKA S,HIROE Y,et al. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions . 2003
[5]
A comparison ofthe radial and the femoral approaches in primary or rescue per-cutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarctionin the elderly. ZIAKAS A,GOMMA A,MCDONALD J,et al. Acute Card Care . 2007
[6]
Ran-domised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for per-cutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myo-cardial infarction:results of the FARMI trial. BRASSELET C,TASSAN S,NAZEYROLLAS P,et al. Heart . 2007
[7]
PCAT Collaborators;percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trial. Grines C,Patel A,Zijlstra F,et al. American Heart Journal . 2003