第三代功能性电刺激联合任务导向训练对卒中后上肢功能的康复作用

被引:10
作者
朱琳
梁军
张冉
刘霖
宋为群
机构
[1] 首都医科大学宣武医院康复医学科
关键词
卒中; 上肢; 康复; 功能性电刺激; 任务导向训练;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R743.3 [急性脑血管疾病(中风)]; R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学]; 100232 [康复医学];
摘要
目的探讨第三代功能电刺激(FES)联合任务导向训练对卒中后上肢功能恢复的作用。方法选择病程3~12个月的初发卒中患者40例,按病例单双号分为FES组和对照组,每组20例。两组患者均接受传统的康复训练,1次/d,30 min/次,5 d/周,共12周。FES组另给予12周的FES治疗,1次/d,15 min/次,5 d/周;根据上肢功能状况给予患者被动电刺激、触发反馈电刺激、助力反馈电刺激结合任务导向训练(杯子训练)的作业治疗。疗效评定采用改良的Ashworth量表(MAS)、Brunnstrom分级量表、Fugl-Meyer运动功能量表(上肢部分,FMA)及腕关节背伸的主动关节活动度(WEAROM)测评。结果 (1)治疗前FES组与对照组各项观察指标差异均无统计学意义。(2)治疗后两组MAS和Brunnstrom量表评分均较治疗前有所改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);但FES组与对照组比较,MAS和Brunnstrom量表的治疗前-后评分差值[分别为(0.7±0.3)、(0.8±0.4)分和(0.6±0.2)、(0.7±0.4)分]差异均无统计学意义。(3)两组FMA评分和WE-AROM均较治疗前提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);FES组FMA评分的治疗前-后差值为(8.3±4.0)分,高于对照组的(4.3±2.5)分;FES组WEAROM的治疗前-后差值为(21±10)度,高于对照组的(14±6)度,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与传统的康复训练相比,结合了FES治疗的康复训练对于卒中患者上肢运动功能改善及腕关节背伸的关节活动度提高效果更明显。但对上肢痉挛改善效果不明显。
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 232
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
实用瘫痪康复.[M].燕铁斌;窦祖林主编;.人民卫生出版社.1999,
[2]
三级康复干预对脑卒中偏瘫患者肌张力影响的动态分析 [J].
王红星 ;
王彤 ;
陈旗 ;
侯红 .
中国康复医学杂志, 2006, (09) :807-810
[3]
功能性电刺激治疗脑卒中后肩关节半脱位疗效观察 [J].
钱开林 ;
王彤 .
中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2003, (01)
[4]
Review of Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation for Dorsiflexion Assist and Orthotic Substitution From the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Stroke Movement Interventions Subcommittee [J].
Bosch, Pamela Rogers ;
Harris, Jocelyn E. ;
Wing, Kay .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (02) :390-396
[5]
Can Surface Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of the Wrist and Hand Combined With Routine Therapy Facilitate Recovery of Arm Function in Patients With Stroke? [J].
Rosewilliam, Sheeba ;
Malhotra, Shweta ;
Roffe, Christine ;
Jones, Peter ;
Pandyan, Anand D. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (10) :1715-1721
[6]
Electrical stimulation and splinting were not clearly more effective than splinting alone for contracture management after acquired brain injury: a randomised trial [J].
Leung, Joan ;
Harvey, Lisa A. ;
Moseley, Anne M. ;
Tse, Charis ;
Bryant, Jane ;
Wyndham, Shirley ;
Barry, Siobhan .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2012, 58 (04) :231-240
[7]
The Effect of Electromyographic Biofeedback Treatment in Improving Upper Extremity Functioning of Patients with Hemiplegic Stroke [J].
Dogan-Aslan, Meryem ;
Nakipoglu-Yuzer, Guldal Funda ;
Dogan, Asuman ;
Karabay, Ilkay ;
Ozgirgin, Nese .
JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2012, 21 (03) :187-192
[8]
fMRI brain mapping during motion capture and FES induced motor tasks: Signal to noise ratio assessment [J].
Gandolla, Marta ;
Ferrante, Simona ;
Casellato, Claudia ;
Ferrigno, Giancarlo ;
Molteni, Franco ;
Martegani, Alberto ;
Frattini, Tiziano ;
Pedrocchi, Alessandra .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2011, 33 (08) :1027-1032
[9]
Clinical Implications of Using the Arm Motor Ability Test in Stroke Rehabilitation [J].
O'Dell, Michael W. ;
Kim, Grace ;
Finnen, Lisa Rivera ;
Polistena, Caitlin .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (05) :830-836
[10]
Functional Electrical Stimulation to Dorsiflexors and Plantar Flexors During Gait to Improve Walking in Adults With Chronic Hemiplegia [J].
Embrey, David G. ;
Holtz, Sandra L. ;
Alon, Gad ;
Brandsma, Brenna A. ;
McCoy, Sarah Westcott .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 91 (05) :687-696