REF与科研评价趋向

被引:25
作者
宋丽萍
机构
[1] 天津师范大学管理学院
关键词
REF; RAE; 文献计量; 同行评议; 科研评价;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G644 [科学研究工作];
学科分类号
摘要
通过分析英国高等教育评估体系从基于同行评议的RAE到基于文献计量的REF的变革,以REF为例探讨计量方法在科研评价中的应用,解读科学评价中两种主要方法之关系以及科研评价的趋向。指出:随着量化份额的增加,文献计量方法的正确应用将成为关键环节,以质量为导向的、同行评议与文献计量相结合的方法将成为未来科研评价的主流。
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 63+100 +100
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
The research excellence framework:A brief guide to the proposals. http://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/planning/public/ref/hefce_REFguide.pdf . 2010
[2]  
Out with the old and in with the new:the RAE,bibliometrics and the new REF. Oppenheim C. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science . 2008
[3]  
Do metrics matter. Abbott A et al. Nature . 2010
[4]  
Bibliometrics comes of age. Glnzel W. http://www.researchtrends.com/issue15-january-2010/research-trends-7 . 2011
[5]  
A profusion of measures. Van Noorden R. Nature . 2010
[6]  
How to improve the use of metrics. Braun T,,Bergstrom C,Frey B. Nature . 2010
[7]  
The hirsch-index and related impact measures. Egghe L. Annual Re-view of Information Science of Technology . 2010
[8]  
Decisions on assessing research impact. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/pubs/2011/0111/0111.pdf . 2011
[9]  
Report on the pilot exercise to develop bibliometric indicators forthe research excellence framework. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2009/0939/0939.pdf . 2011
[10]  
Let’’s make science metrics more scientific. Julie Jane. Nature . 2010