概念转变理论及其发展述评

被引:32
作者
吴娴 [1 ]
罗星凯 [2 ]
辛涛 [3 ]
机构
[1] 广西师范学院物理与电子科学系
[2] 广西师范大学科学教育研究所
[3] 北京师范大学发展心理研究所
关键词
概念转变; 认识论; 本体论; 框架理论; 多维课堂概念转变框架;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G420 [教学研究和改革];
学科分类号
040102 ;
摘要
概念转变是心理与教育领域的热点问题。20多年来,研究者从不同的背景和视角研究概念转变的过程与机制,提出了基于认识论、本体论和朴素理论的多个概念转变理论,成为后续概念转变研究的理论框架。随着研究的深入,这些概念转变理论得以继承和发展,表现为融入了社会、情感等因素并具整合的趋势。本文对当前国际主流的概念转变理论及其发展加以评述,并从问题、方法和视角等方面对未来的概念转变研究加以展望,提出构建更具普适性的概念转变理论框架的设想。
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 886
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   概念转变模型及其发展 [J].
张建伟 .
心理学动态, 1998, (03) :34-38
[2]   Helping students understand challenging topics in science through ontology training [J].
Slotta, James D. ;
Chi, Michelene T. H. .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2006, 24 (02) :261-289
[3]   Is children's naive knowledge consistent? A comparison of the concepts of sound and heat [J].
Lautrey, J ;
Mazens, K .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2004, 14 (04) :399-423
[4]   Modes of knowing and ways of reasoning in elementary astronomy [J].
Vosniadou, S ;
Skopeliti, I ;
Ikospentaki, K .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 19 (02) :203-222
[5]  
Conceptual change in physics: children’s naive representations of sound[J] . Karine Mazens,Jacques Lautrey.Cognitive Development . 2003 (2)
[6]  
Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning[J] . Reinders Duit,David F. Treagust.International Journal of Science Education . 2003 (6)
[7]  
Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science[J] . Stella Vosniadou,Christos Ioannides,Aggeliki Dimitrakopoulou,Efi Papademetriou.Learning and Instruction . 2001 (4)
[8]  
On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal[J] . Margarita Limón.Learning and Instruction . 2001 (4)
[9]  
From conceptual development to science education: a psychological point of view[J] . Stella Vosniadou,Christos Ioannides.International Journal of Science Education . 1998 (10)
[10]  
Assessing Students’ Misclassifications of Physics Concepts: An Ontological Basis for Conceptual Change[J] . James D. Slotta,Michelene T. H. Chi,Elana Joram.Cognition and Instruction . 1995 (3)