PASI临床指标可靠性评价

被引:7
作者
张长宋
陈树民
机构
[1] 山东省皮肤病性病防治研究所
关键词
PASI; 银屑病; 可靠性;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R758.63 [牛皮癣(银屑病)];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
目的 : 评价银屑病PASI记分系统中红斑、脱屑、浸润和受累面积指标的可靠性。方法 : 按PASI记分法 ,三位皮肤科医生分别对银屑病患者进行评估 ,将所得资料计算各指标的Kappa值。结果 :临床症状指标的红斑、脱屑和浸润Kappa值分别为 0 .36 1、0 .384、0 .319,均 <0 .4,一致性较差。受累面积指标Kappa值为 0 .5 92 ,一致性不满意。结论 : 应用PASI法评价寻常型银屑病病情严重性的可靠性较差 ,在应用PASI做为评价工具的临床药物试验中对结果解释应慎重。
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 121
页数:2
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Application of machine vision to assess involved surface in patients with psoriasis. Savolainen. L,Kontinen. J,Roning J,et al. Br J Dermatol . 1997
[2]  
The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and alternative approaches for the assessment of severity: persisting areas of confusion. van de Kerkhof PC. Br J Dermatol . 1997
[3]  
The psoriasis area and severity index and alternative approaches for the assessment of severity: persisting areas of confusion. Van De Kerkhof PCM. Br J Dermatol . 1997
[4]  
Clinical evaluation of a more rapid and sensitive Psoriasis Assessment Severity Score (PASS),and its comparison with the classic method of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), before and after climatotherapy at the DeadSea. Harari M,Shani J,Hristakieva M,et al. International Journal of Dermatology . 2000
[5]  
The self-administered PASI. Feldman SR,Fleischer AB,Reboussin DM,et al. Journal of Investigative Dermatology . 1996
[6]  
Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with mild to moderate eczema and psoriasis: clinical validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of the DLQI.The Cavide Research Group. Badia X,Mascaro JM,Lozano R. Br J Dermatol . 1999
[7]  
Clinical measures of disease severity and outcome on psoriasis: a critical appraisal of their quality. Ashcroft DM,Wanpo L,Williams HC,et al. Br J Dermatol . 1999
[8]  
Reliability testing of the Dermatology Index of Disease Severity (DIDS): an index for staging the severity of cutaneous inflammatory disease. Faust HB,Gonin R,Chuang TY,et al. Archives of Dermatology . 1997