下颈椎全椎板切除后不同内固定技术螺钉的应力分布

被引:9
作者
段扬 [1 ]
靳安民 [1 ]
张辉 [1 ]
张力 [1 ]
闵少雄 [1 ]
胡孔和 [2 ]
机构
[1] 南方医科大学珠江医院骨科中心
[2] 汕头大学粤北人民医院骨科
关键词
下颈椎; 全椎板切除术; 有限元模型; 内固定; 应力分布;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R687.3 [骨骼手术];
学科分类号
100220 [骨科学];
摘要
目的:探讨下颈椎全椎板切除后不同内固定技术螺钉的应力分布规律。方法:采集1例成年健康男性志愿者下颈椎(C3C7)的CT数据集,应用Mimics 10.01、Geomagic studio 10.0、Hyper Mesh 10.0、Abaqus 6.9.1等软件建立下颈椎(C3C7)完整模型、三节段全椎板切除后模型、全椎板切除后椎弓根螺钉内固定(pedicle screw fixation,PSF)技术重建模型和经关节突螺钉内固定(transarticular screw fixation,TSF)技术重建模型。模拟施加75N头颅预载荷和1.0Nm运动附加力,使模型产生前屈、后伸、侧屈和旋转运动,分析两种内固定技术的螺钉应力分布情况。结果:所建完整下颈椎有限元模型与实体模型具有较好的几何相似性,共有61464个单元,16588个节点;加载后在各种工况下节间运动范围与文献实体测量结果吻合,表明完整模型有效。在此模型上建立了下颈椎三节段全椎板切除、PSF和TSF内固定重建的有限元模型。在各种工况下,PSF重建模型在钛棒与螺钉接合部易发生应力集中,应力峰值低于160MPa;TSF重建模型螺钉中部易发生应力集中,应力峰值高于2800MPa。结论:应用CT扫描数据建立的下颈椎三维有限元模型能模拟正常状态、全椎板切除及不同内固定技术重建,相比PSF重建技术,TSF有较高的断钉风险。
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 894
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]
Spinal deformity after multilevel osteoplastic laminotomy [J].
Raab, Peter ;
Juergen, Krauss ;
Gloger, Harald ;
Soerensen, Nils ;
Wild, Alexander .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 32 (03) :355-359
[2]
Biomechanical comparison of transarticular facet screws to lateral mass plates in two-level instrumentations of the cervical spine [J].
DalCanto, RA ;
Lieberman, I ;
Inceoglu, S ;
Kayanja, M ;
Ferrara, L .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (08) :897-902
[3]
A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation - Effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling [J].
Ferrara, LA ;
Secor, JL ;
Jin, BH ;
Wakefield, A ;
Inceoglu, S ;
Benzel, EC .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (12) :1226-1234
[4]
Mechanical Properties of the Human Cervical Spine as Shown by Three-Dimensional Load–Displacement Curves.[J].Manohar M. Panjabi;Joseph J. Crisco;Anita Vasavada;Takenori Oda;Jacek Cholewicki;Kimio Nibu;Eon Shin.Spine.2001, 24
[5]
Accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement using the funnel technique [J].
Karaikovic, EE ;
Yingsakmongkol, W ;
Gaines, RW .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (22) :2456-2462
[6]
Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling [J].
Yoganandan, N ;
Kumaresan, S ;
Pintar, FA .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 16 (01) :1-27
[7]
Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws - Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison [J].
Jones, EL ;
Heller, JG ;
Silcox, DH ;
Hutton, WC .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (09) :977-982
[8]
Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Stabilization Systems: An Assessment of Transpedicular Screw Fixation in the Cervical Spine.[J].Yoshihisa Kotani;Bryan W. Cunningham;Kuniyoshi Abumi;Paul C. McAfee.SPINE.1994, 22 S