标准设定:步骤、方法与评价指标

被引：16

作者：

李珍 ^{[1
]}

辛涛 ^{[1
]}

陈平 ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] 北京师范大学心理学院

[2] 北京师范大学

来源：

考试研究 | 2010年 / 6卷 / 02期

关键词：

标准设定; 标准设定方法; 评价指标;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D630 [国家机关工作与人事管理];

学科分类号：

1204 ; 120401 ;

摘要：

标准设定(standard setting)是划分标准的过程,指在测验分数分布中划分出两类或两类以上的分界分数。通过标准设定,考生可以被分为"通过"和"未通过",或者是被分为更多的有序表现类别。标准设定是标准参照测验的重要组成部分,也可为测验决策者提供关于测验效度的依据,是目前测量领域一个颇受关注的研究问题。本文首先回顾了标准设定的源起和发展历程,然后详细地介绍了标准设定的基本步骤和几种主要的标准设定方法,评估标准设定过程的指标,最后简单论述了在国内各类考试中应用标准设定的必要性。

引用

页码：83 / 95

页数：13

共 10 条

[1] 科学确定专业人才资格考试的合格标准 [J].

赵世明 .

中国人才, 2007, (17) :66-67

[2]

对HSK三、六级发证标准的验证性研究[D]. 徐静.北京语言大学 2004

[3]

若干标准设定方法的心理计量学比较初探[D]. 曹怡.华东师范大学 2003

[4] An Empirical Examination of the Impact of Group Discussion and Examinee Performance Information on Judgments Made in the Angoff Standard-Setting Procedure [J].

Clauser, Brian E. ;

Harik, Polina ;

Margolis, Melissa J. ;

McManus, I. C. ;

Mollon, Jennifer ;

Chis, Liliana ;

Williams, Simon .

APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2009, 22 (01) :1-21

[5]

Commentary: A Response to Reckase’s Conceptual Framework and Examples for Evaluating Standard Setting Methods[J] . E. MatthewSchulz.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice . 2006 (3)

[6]

Rejoinder: Evaluating Standard Setting Methods Using Error Models Proposed by Schulz[J] . Mark D.Reckase.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice . 2006 (3)

[7]

A Conceptual Framework for a Psychometric Theory for Standard Setting with Examples of Its Use for Evaluating the Functioning of Two Standard Setting Methods[J] . Mark D.Reckase.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice . 2006 (2)

[8] A domain-level approach to describing growth in achievement [J].

Schulz, EM ;

Lee, WC ;

Mullen, K .

JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2005, 42 (01) :1-26

[9]

Ability of Panelists to Estimate Item Performance for a Target Group of Candidates: An Issue in Judgmental Standard Setting[J] . Barbara S. Plake,James C. Impara.Educational Assessment . 2001 (2)

[10]

Validating the performance standards asso-ciated with passing scores. Kane,M.T. The Review of Education . 1994

← 1 →