中国大学拔尖人才培养项目内部冲突实证研究

被引：25

作者：

阎琨

机构：

[1] 清华大学教育研究院

来源：

清华大学教育研究 | 2018年 / 39卷 / 05期

关键词：

拔尖人才项目; 冲突; 拔尖大学生;

D O I：

10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.05.006312

中图分类号：

G649.2 [中国];

学科分类号：

040106 ;

摘要：

本研究考察了在启动中国拔尖人才教育改革时,"珠峰计划"所面临的内部冲突。研究发现"珠峰计划"中的多重冲突涉及计划培养需求与学生个人成长需求之间的冲突,项目选拔目的与学生个人动机之间的冲突,鉴别人才与鉴别人才发展路径之间的冲突,以及拔尖项目巨大的内部差异与同质化的课程之间的冲突。这些冲突涉及对拔尖教育和拔尖学生的起源与发展的诸多争议。本研究还讨论了解决和缓解这些冲突的可能方法,以期使拔尖人才教育和基础学科培养计划项目得到完善和提高。

引用

页码：63 / 74

页数：12

共 11 条

[1] 从“少年班”“基地班”到“拔尖计划”的实施——35年来我国基础学科拔尖人才培养的回溯与前瞻 [J].

叶俊飞 .

中国高教研究, 2014, (04) :13-19

[2]

Special Class for the Gifted Young: A 34-Year Experimentation With Early College Entrance Programs in China[J] . David Yun Dai,Saiying Steenbergen-Hu.Roeper Review . 2015 (1)

[3] The Chinese Century? The Challenges of Higher Education [J].

Kirby, William C. .

DAEDALUS, 2014, 143 (02) :145-156

[4] Towards a systemic theory of gifted education [J].

Ziegler, Albert ;

Phillipson, Shane N. .

HIGH ABILITY STUDIES, 2012, 23 (01) :3-30

[5]

The Actiotope Model of Giftedness: a useful model for examining gifted education in China’s universities[J] . Weiguo Pang.High Ability Studies . 2012 (1)

[6]

Different research paradigms concerning giftedness and gifted education: shall ever they meet?[J] . Kurt A. Heller.High Ability Studies . 2012 (1)

[7] Chinese science and the 'Nobel Prize complex' [J].

Cao, C .

MINERVA, 2004, 42 (02) :151-172

[8]

Understanding Giftedness and Underachievement: At the Edge of Possibility[J] . Robert Arthur Schultz.Gifted Child Quarterly . 2002 (3)

[9]

Underachievement of Highly able Students and the Peer Society[J] . Rae Clasen Donna,Clasen Robert E..Gifted and Talented International . 1995 (2)

[10]

Academic Underachievement Among the Gifted: Students' Perceptions of Factors that Reverse the Pattern[J] . Linda J. Emerick.Gifted Child Quarterly . 1992 (3)

← 1 2 →