“一带一路”贸易网络及其与全球贸易网络的拓扑关系分析(英文)

被引:19
作者
宋周莺 [1 ,2 ,3 ]
车姝韵 [1 ,2 ,3 ]
杨宇 [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS
[2] Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS
[3] College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
关键词
Belt and Road Initiative; global trade network; trade community; topological relationship;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F742 [国际贸易关系];
学科分类号
020206 ; 1202 ; 020202 ;
摘要
Unimpeded trade is one of the cooperation priorities in the Belt and Road Initiative proposed by China. On 15 May 2017, the Joint Communique of the Leaders Roundtable of the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation reaffirmed the participants' shared commitment to build an open economy and ensure free and inclusive trade. The Belt and Road Initiative(BRI) is not only China's new action to drive its open and global development, but also a platform for an increasing number of countries to explore free and inclusive trade and promote a universal, rule-based, open, non-discriminatory, and equitable multilateral trade system. It is therefore important to examine the topological relationship between the BRI and global trade networks. More specifically, this article first analyzes the community structure of trade networks using a community detection algorithm, and then estimates the topological relationship between different trade communities. The findings of this article are as follows. First, this research identified three trade communities and two sub-communities in the BRI trade network, in which China is the core, Russia is the sub-core of the biggest trade community, and India, United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia are cores of the second trade community(South Asia-West Asia). Second, it identified five trade communities in the global trade network, centred on China, USA, Russia, India-United Arab Emirates, and Germany-Netherlands-France-Britain and other European developed countries. Third, the topological analysis indicated that in the global trade network, most BRI countries are attracted by the core nodes of the BRI regions, such as the China, Russia and India-United Arab Emirates core nodes, and have strong trade contacts with BRI countries. Most Central-East European countries are mainly attracted by Germany-Netherlands-France-Britain and other developed European countries with a low penetration of BRI trade. Although some Southeast Asian countries are incorporated into the Asia-Australia-South Africa community with China as the core, they still need to strengthen trade linkages with BRI countries.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1262
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   “一带一路”:引领包容性全球化 [J].
刘卫东 .
中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32 (04) :331-339
[2]   我国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易特征研究 [J].
宋周莺 ;
车姝韵 ;
张薇 .
中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32 (04) :363-369
[3]   “一带一路”沿线国家天然气贸易网络结构及影响因素 [J].
马远 ;
徐俐俐 .
世界经济研究, 2017, (03) :109-122+136
[4]   中国与“一带一路”国家农产品贸易竞争性和互补性分析 [J].
何敏 ;
张宁宁 ;
黄泽群 .
农业经济问题, 2016, 37 (11) :51-60+111
[5]   2001~2013年中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易网络分析 [J].
邹嘉龄 ;
刘卫东 .
地理科学, 2016, 36 (11) :1629-1636
[6]   一国农产品贸易网络特征及其对全球价值链分工的影响——基于社会网络分析视角 [J].
马述忠 ;
任婉婉 ;
吴国杰 .
管理世界, 2016, (03) :60-72
[7]   “一带一路”国家双边贸易与中国经济增长的动态关系——基于空间交互作用视角 [J].
王美昌 ;
徐康宁 .
世界经济研究, 2016, (02) :101-110+137
[8]   贸易网络地位、研发投入与技术扩散——基于全球高端制造业贸易数据的实证研究 [J].
许和连 ;
孙天阳 ;
吴钢 .
中国软科学, 2015, (09) :55-69
[9]   中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易的商品格局 [J].
公丕萍 ;
宋周莺 ;
刘卫东 .
地理科学进展, 2015, 34 (05) :571-580
[10]   2000-2009年世界贸易格局的社会网络分析 [J].
陈银飞 .
国际贸易问题, 2011, (11) :31-42