人文社会科学研究评鉴特性及指标探讨

被引:16
作者
黄慕萱
机构
[1] 台湾大学图书资讯学系
关键词
学术评鉴; 人文社会科学; 书目计量; 学术评鉴指标;
D O I
10.13613/j.cnki.qhdz.001892
中图分类号
C12 [];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
由于人文社会科学学科属性的不同、出版品型态和内容的差异及学者自我期许的差异,人文社会科学学者学术评鉴及评鉴指标的特性当有不同的方式。人文社会科学学者的研究产出具有出版种类多元、图书与期刊均是重要的出版品、图书引用比率高、研究议题具本土性及引用较旧的文献数据等特性,因此进行学术评鉴时不能仅就西文期刊文章数及其被引用次数进行评鉴,应采用结合书目计量与同行评鉴的多元指标,同时考虑较长时间的出版品数量和质量。
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 43+158 +158
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Citation Analysis for Collection Development: A Comparative Study of Eight Humanities Fields[J] . Jennifer E. Knievel,Charlene Kellsey.The Library Quarterly . 2005 (2)
[2]  
Literature Use by U.S. Economists Published in 1999[J] . William C. Robinson,Paul E. Poston.Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian . 2004 (2)
[3]   The UK Research Assessment Exercise 2001 [J].
Elkin, J .
LIBRI, 2002, 52 (04) :204-208
[4]   The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship [J].
Thompson, JW .
LIBRI, 2002, 52 (03) :121-136
[5]   The sources used by bibliometrics-scientometrics as reflected in references [J].
Peritz, BC ;
Bar-Ilan, J .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 54 (02) :269-284
[6]   Research assessment in Hong Kong [J].
French, NJ ;
Massy, WF ;
Young, K .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2001, 42 (01) :35-46
[7]  
Evaluating research performance: the strategy of the University of Naples Federico II (Italy)[J] . Gianfranco Carotenuto,Mariagloria Lapegna,Giuseppe Zollo,Alberto Di Donato,Luigi Nicolais.Higher Education Policy . 2001 (1)
[8]  
The International Visibility and Citation Impact of Scandinavian Research Articles in Selected Social Science Fields: The Decay of a Myth[J] . Peter Ingwersen.Scientometrics . 2000 (1)
[9]   The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences [J].
Hicks, D .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1999, 44 (02) :193-215
[10]  
Measuring quality in universities: An approach to weighting research productivity[J] . Murray Print,John Hattie.Higher Education . 1997 (4)