辩论的逻辑模型研究综述

被引：17

作者：

熊才权 ^{[1
]}

孙贤斌 ^{[2
]}

欧阳勇 ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] 湖北工业大学计算机学院

[2] 湖北工业大学土木工程与建筑学院

来源：

模式识别与人工智能 | 2010年 / 23卷 / 03期

关键词：

非单调推理; 辩论; 辩论模型; 争议评价;

D O I：

10.16451/j.cnki.issn1003-6059.2010.03.017

中图分类号：

TP181 [自动推理、机器学习];

学科分类号：

140502 [人工智能];

摘要：

辩论的逻辑模型是哲学、逻辑学和人工智能等多个领域的研究课题,在非单调推理、法律推理、决策支持和多Agent交互等领域有广泛应用.文中首先简要阐述辩论及辩论模型的基本概念.然后从对辩论建模和用辩论建模两个方面对目前的研究进行总结,分析现有的有影响的辩论模型特点及其存在的问题.最后,指出今后的研究方向和发展趋势.

引用

收藏

页码：362 / 368

页数：7

相关论文

共 10 条

[1]

Agents that argue and explain classifications [J].

Amgoud, Leila ;

Serrurier, Mathieu .

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2008, 16 (02) :187-209

[2]

On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms.[J].Martin Caminada;Leila Amgoud.Artificial Intelligence.2007, 5

[3]

The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof.[J].Thomas F. Gordon;Henry Prakken;Douglas Walton.Artificial Intelligence.2007, 10

[4]

Modular representation of agent interaction rules through argumentation [J].

Kakas, A ;

Maudet, N ;

Moraitis, P .

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2005, 11 (02) :189-206

[5]

A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments [J].

Amgoud, L ;

Cayrol, C .

ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 34 (1-3) :197-215

[6]

Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks [J].

Amgoud, L ;

Cayrol, C .

JOURNAL OF AUTOMATED REASONING, 2002, 29 (02) :125-169

[7]

Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system [J].

Karacapilidis, N ;

Papadias, D .

INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2001, 26 (04) :259-277

[8]

Supporting argumentation practices in urban planning and design.[J].C. Tweed.Computers; Environment and Urban Systems.1998, 4

[9]

A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning.[J].H. Prakken;G. Sartor.Artificial Intelligence and Law.1996, 3-4

[10]

ON THE ACCEPTABILITY OF ARGUMENTS AND ITS FUNDAMENTAL ROLE IN NONMONOTONIC REASONING, LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND N-PERSON GAMES [J].

DUNG, PM .

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 77 (02) :321-357