证券欺诈法律责任的边界新近美国最高法院虚假陈述判例研究

被引：31

作者：

郭雳

机构：

[1] 北京大学法学院

来源：

关键词：

最高法院; 联邦; 国家结构; 虚假陈述; 证券欺诈; 美利坚合众国; 北美洲; 美国; 边界;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D971.2 []; DD912.28 [];

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：630 / 639

页数：10

共 8 条

[1] 新证券法条文解析[M]. 人民法院出版社 , 周正庆,李飞,桂敏杰主编, 2006
[2] Reforming Securities Litigation Reform: Restructuring the Relationship between Public and Private Enforcement of Rule 10B-5[J] . Amanda M. Rose.Columbia Law Review . 2008 (6)
[3] Reforming the Securities Class Action: An Essay on Deterrence and Its Implementation[J] . John C. Coffee.Columbia Law Review . 2006 (7)
[4] Outside director liability
Black, B
Cheffins, B
Klausner, M
[J]. STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 2006, 58 (04) : 1055 - 1159
[5] The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the making of quack corporate governance
Romano, R
[J]. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 2005, 114 (07) : 1521 - +
[6] Demystifying causation in fraud-on-the-market actions
Fox, MB
[J]. BUSINESS LAWYER, 2005, 60 (02) : 507 - +
[7] Causation by presumption?: Why the supreme court should reject phantom losses and reverse Broudo
Coffee, JC
[J]. BUSINESS LAWYER, 2005, 60 (02) : 533 - +
[8] Securities Regulation: Cases and Materials. James D. Cox,Robert W. Hillman,Donald C. Langevoort. Aspen Publisher, Inc . 2001

证券欺诈法律责任的边界 新近美国最高法院虚假陈述判例研究