排污税与减排补贴的减排效应比较研究

被引:12
作者
许士春
机构
[1] 中国矿业大学管理学院经济系
关键词
排污税; 减排补贴; 减排效应; 环境政策;
D O I
10.19626/j.cnki.cn31-1163/f.2012.07.002
中图分类号
F812.4 [财政收入、支出]; F205 [资源、环境和生态管理]; F224 [经济数学方法];
学科分类号
120405 ; 020106 ; 0701 ; 070104 ;
摘要
研究排污税、减排补贴对减排的影响机理,并从污染排放控制效果、等量污染排放下的社会福利影响等方面对减排效应进行比较分析,得出以下结论:排污税率、减排补贴率均与污染排放负相关,与社会福利水平的关系均受税率和补贴率的影响;当税率和补贴率等量提高时,排污税效果比减排补贴的效果好;当经济由未采用政策到采用政策而导致等量减排时,就社会福利的增加量而言,减排补贴比排污税的社会福利增加量大。此研究结论从政策的减排效果和福利影响方面,给予政府制定减排政策提供了参考依据。
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 21
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Environmental taxes in a differentiated mixed duopoly[J] . Leonard F.S. Wang,Jean Wang.Economic Systems . 2009 (4)
[2]   Can allowing to trade permits enhance welfare in mixed oligopoly? [J].
Kato, Kazuhiko .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (03) :263-283
[3]   Mixed oligopoly and environmental policy [J].
Barcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos ;
Garzon, Maria Begona .
SPANISH ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 8 (02) :139-160
[4]  
Mixed Duopoly, Merger and Multiproduct Firms[J] . Journal of Economics . 2003 (1)
[5]  
Relative standards: A positive and normative analysis[J] . Udo Ebert. . 1998 (1)
[6]  
Costly pollution abatement, competitiveness and plant location decisions[J] . James R. Markusen.Resource and Energy Economics . 1997 (4)
[7]   Correlated uncertainty and policy instrument choice [J].
Stavins, RN .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (02) :218-232
[8]  
Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization[J] . Mark D. White.Economics Letters . 1996 (2)
[9]  
Environmental policy instruments and imperfectly competitive international trade[J] . Alistair fnUlph.Environmental and Resource Economics . 1996 (4)
[10]   COMPETITION IN REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES WHEN PLANT LOCATIONS ARE ENDOGENOUS [J].
MARKUSEN, JR ;
MOREY, ER ;
OLEWILER, N .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1995, 56 (01) :55-77