我国碳税与碳排放权交易政策工具的选择研究

被引:3
作者
曾悦
机构
[1] 华南理工大学广州学院
关键词
碳税; 碳交易; 社会福利;
D O I
10.14057/j.cnki.cn43-1156/f.2017.10.041
中图分类号
F812.42 [税收]; X196 [环境经济学];
学科分类号
020203 ; 02 ; 0201 ; 020106 ;
摘要
本文建立不同碳政策调控下的社会福利函数,比较社会福利最大化条件下,最优碳税与碳排放额度的影响因素,同时探讨企业减排效率与违约率对混合政策下最优政策比例的影响。研究结果表明:整体企业违约率越高,适合实施高比例碳交易政策调控;对于减排技术落后的企业越多,实施高比例碳税政策效果更有效。研究结果不仅能有利于分析我国碳市场的发展现状,而且为相关政府机构提供建议支持。
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 93
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
我国碳税与碳交易机制的设计研究.[D].方蕾.华东师范大学.2012, 01
[2]  
碳税与碳交易机制的比较研究.[D].何禹忠.湖南大学.2011, 05
[3]   Strategic climate policy with offsets and incomplete abatement: Carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade [J].
Strand, Jon .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 66 (02) :202-218
[4]   Carbon markets and technological innovation [J].
Weber, Thomas A. ;
Neuhoff, Karsten .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 60 (02) :115-132
[5]   Optimal mix of emissions taxes and cap-and-trade [J].
Mandell, Svante .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 56 (02) :131-140
[6]   Impacts of EU carbon emission trade directive on energy-intensive industries - Indicative micro-economic analyses [J].
Lund, Peter .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (04) :799-806
[7]   Testing the theory of emissions trading: Experimental evidence on alternative mechanisms for global carbon trading [J].
Klaassen, G ;
Nentjes, A ;
Smith, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 53 (01) :47-58
[8]   When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets [J].
Parry, IWH ;
Williams, RC ;
Goulder, LH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 37 (01) :52-84